2013•Zhongguo jiceng yiyaoRequires access

The efficacy comparison of insulin aspart 30 and insulin glargine intensive treatment in the treatment of type 2 diabetes

Zhaoliang Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare efficacy of different insulin intensive treatment in the treatment of type 2 diabetes,to provide a reference for the programming of intensive treatment of diabetes.Methods 60 type 2 diabetes patients met inclusion criteria were divided into insulin aspart 30 intensive treatment group (I group) and insulin glargine intensive treatment group(Ⅱ group) by random number table,30 cases of each group,I group was given subcutaneous injection of insulin aspart 30,tid,Ⅱ group was given subcutaneous injection of insulin glargine at bedtime,qd.Both groups were treated for 14d,record the time of blood glucose control,observed the occurrence of low blood sugar,detected the HOMA-IR,HOMA-β and clinical efficacy.Results After treatment,the fasting glucose,2h postprandial blood glucose,glycosylated hemoglobin,HOMA-IR,HOMA-β of Ⅰ group and Ⅱ group were (6.0 ± 0.9)mmol/L vs (5.4 ±1.1)mmol/L,(7.4 ± 1.9)mmol/L vs (6.6±2.3)mmol/L,(6.2 ± 1.7)% vs (6.0 ± 1.9)%,(1.11 ±0.32) vs (1.01 ±0.35),(5.23 ± 1.63) vs (5.46 ±1.41),the fasting glucose,2h postprandial blood glucose,glycosylated hemoglobin,HOMA-IR of Ⅰ and Ⅱ group after treatment compared with those before treatment,the differences were statistically significant.The HOMA-β of Ⅰ and Ⅱ group was significantly higher than that before treatment,the difference was statistically significant.The fasting blood glucose,2h postprandial blood glucose,glycosylated hemoglobin,HOMA-IR,HOMA-β before and after treatment between two groups was not significantly different,the time of blood glucose control between Ⅰ and Ⅱ group were (6.5 ± 2.8) d vs (6.2 ± 2.5) d,the difference was not statistically significant,the low blood sugar of Ⅰ and group Ⅱ was 20% (6/30) vs 3% (1/30),there was statistically significant difference.Conclusion The insulin aspart 30 and insulin glargine intensive treatment all can control blood sugar,increase insulin β-cell function,reduce insulin resistance in the treatment of type 2 diabetes,but insulin glargine significantly reduced the incidence of hypoglycemia and insulin glargine is the ideal insulin for blood glucose security control. Key words: Diabetes mellitus,type 2; Insulin,long-acting; Recombinant proteins; Injections,subcutaneous

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare efficacy of different insulin intensive treatment in the treatment of type 2 diabetes,to provide a reference for the programming of intensive treatment of diabetes.Methods 60 type 2 diabetes patients met inclusion criteria were divided into insulin aspart 30 intensive treatment group (I group) and insulin glargine intensive treatment group(Ⅱ group) by random number table,30 cases of each group,I group was given subcutaneous injection of insulin aspart 30,tid,Ⅱ group was given subcutaneous injection of insulin glargine at bedtime,qd.Both groups were treated for 14d,record the time of blood glucose control,observed the occurrence of low blood sugar,detected the HOMA-IR,HOMA-β and clinical efficacy.Results After treatment,the fasting glucose,2h postprandial blood glucose,glycosylated hemoglobin,HOMA-IR,HOMA-β of Ⅰ group and Ⅱ group were (6.0 ± 0.9)mmol/L vs (5.4 ±1.1)mmol/L,(7.4 ± 1.9)mmol/L vs (6.6±2.3)mmol/L,(6.2 ± 1.7)% vs (6.0 ± 1.9)%,(1.11 ±0.32) vs (1.01 ±0.35),(5.23 ± 1.63) vs (5.46 ±1.41),the fasting glucose,2h postprandial blood glucose,glycosylated hemoglobin,HOMA-IR of Ⅰ and Ⅱ group after treatment compared with those before treatment,the differences were statistically significant.The HOMA-β of Ⅰ and Ⅱ group was significantly higher than that before treatment,the difference was statistically significant.The fasting blood glucose,2h postprandial blood glucose,glycosylated hemoglobin,HOMA-IR,HOMA-β before and after treatment between two groups was not significantly different,the time of blood glucose control between Ⅰ and Ⅱ group were (6.5 ± 2.8) d vs (6.2 ± 2.5) d,the difference was not statistically significant,the low blood sugar of Ⅰ and group Ⅱ was 20% (6/30) vs 3% (1/30),there was statistically significant difference.Conclusion The insulin aspart 30 and insulin glargine intensive treatment all can control blood sugar,increase insulin β-cell function,reduce insulin resistance in the treatment of type 2 diabetes,but insulin glargine significantly reduced the incidence of hypoglycemia and insulin glargine is the ideal insulin for blood glucose security control. Key words: Diabetes mellitus,type 2; Insulin,long-acting; Recombinant proteins; Injections,subcutaneous

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare efficacy of different insulin intensive treatment in the treatment of type 2 diabetes,to provide a reference for the programming of intensive treatment of diabetes.Methods 60 type 2 diabetes patients met inclusion criteria were divided into insulin aspart 30 intensive treatment group (I group) and insulin glargine intensive treatment group(Ⅱ group) by random number table,30 cases of each group,I group was given subcutaneous injection of insulin aspart 30,tid,Ⅱ group was given subcutaneous injection of insulin glargine at bedtime,qd.Both groups were treated for 14d,record the time of blood glucose control,observed the occurrence of low blood sugar,detected the HOMA-IR,HOMA-β and clinical efficacy.Results After treatment,the fasting glucose,2h postprandial blood glucose,glycosylated hemoglobin,HOMA-IR,HOMA-β of Ⅰ group and Ⅱ group were (6.0 ± 0.9)mmol/L vs (5.4 ±1.1)mmol/L,(7.4 ± 1.9)mmol/L vs (6.6±2.3)mmol/L,(6.2 ± 1.7)% vs (6.0 ± 1.9)%,(1.11 ±0.32) vs (1.01 ±0.35),(5.23 ± 1.63) vs (5.46 ±1.41),the fasting glucose,2h postprandial blood glucose,glycosylated hemoglobin,HOMA-IR of Ⅰ and Ⅱ group after treatment compared with those before treatment,the differences were statistically significant.The HOMA-β of Ⅰ and Ⅱ group was significantly higher than that before treatment,the difference was statistically significant.The fasting blood glucose,2h postprandial blood glucose,glycosylated hemoglobin,HOMA-IR,HOMA-β before and after treatment between two groups was not significantly different,the time of blood glucose control between Ⅰ and Ⅱ group were (6.5 ± 2.8) d vs (6.2 ± 2.5) d,the difference was not statistically significant,the low blood sugar of Ⅰ and group Ⅱ was 20% (6/30) vs 3% (1/30),there was statistically significant difference.Conclusion The insulin aspart 30 and insulin glargine intensive treatment all can control blood sugar,increase insulin β-cell function,reduce insulin resistance in the treatment of type 2 diabetes,but insulin glargine significantly reduced the incidence of hypoglycemia and insulin glargine is the ideal insulin for blood glucose security control. Key words: Diabetes mellitus,type 2; Insulin,long-acting; Recombinant proteins; Injections,subcutaneous

Key concepts: Medicine, Postprandial, Insulin aspart, Internal medicine, Insulin glargine, Hemoglobin, Insulin, Endocrinology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The efficacy comparison of insulin aspart 30 and insulin glargine intensive treatment in the treatment of type 2 diabetes — Research Paper | ScholarLens