2013Zhonghua fangshe yixue yu fanghu zazhiRequires access

Comparison of the absorbed dose measurement methods for high-energy electron beams

Yanyan Guo, Ping Bi, Xiaodong Li, Yue Dai

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To study the difference in the measurement of the absorbed dose in water between the dosimetry protocols of IAEA TRS-398 and TRS-277 for high-energy electron beams.Methods The differences were compare in absorbed doses from 6 kinds of electron beams among the three methods of using cylindrical chamber,plane-parallel chamber and cross-calibrated plane-parallel chamber which was calibrated in user' s high-energy electron beam according to IAEA TRS-398 and IAEA TRS-277.Results The difference in absorbed doses measured,following the two protocols,was 0.4%-2.3% for planeparallel chamber,0.6%-2.2% for cylindrical chamber,and 0.5%-2.0% for cross-calibrated chamber.The differences in measured absorbed doses between the two dosimetry protocols were slight.Conclusions The methods used to determine absorbed dose to water recommanded by IAEA TRS-398 for high-energy beams are more accurate and more suitable for clinical users to measure compared to the TRS-277. Key words: Radiotherapy;  Dosimetry;  Absorbed dose;  Ionization chamber

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To study the difference in the measurement of the absorbed dose in water between the dosimetry protocols of IAEA TRS-398 and TRS-277 for high-energy electron beams.Methods The differences were compare in absorbed doses from 6 kinds of electron beams among the three methods of using cylindrical chamber,plane-parallel chamber and cross-calibrated plane-parallel chamber which was calibrated in user' s high-energy electron beam according to IAEA TRS-398 and IAEA TRS-277.Results The difference in absorbed doses measured,following the two protocols,was 0.4%-2.3% for planeparallel chamber,0.6%-2.2% for cylindrical chamber,and 0.5%-2.0% for cross-calibrated chamber.The differences in measured absorbed doses between the two dosimetry protocols were slight.Conclusions The methods used to determine absorbed dose to water recommanded by IAEA TRS-398 for high-energy beams are more accurate and more suitable for clinical users to measure compared to the TRS-277. Key words: Radiotherapy;  Dosimetry;  Absorbed dose;  Ionization chamber

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To study the difference in the measurement of the absorbed dose in water between the dosimetry protocols of IAEA TRS-398 and TRS-277 for high-energy electron beams.Methods The differences were compare in absorbed doses from 6 kinds of electron beams among the three methods of using cylindrical chamber,plane-parallel chamber and cross-calibrated plane-parallel chamber which was calibrated in user' s high-energy electron beam according to IAEA TRS-398 and IAEA TRS-277.Results The difference in absorbed doses measured,following the two protocols,was 0.4%-2.3% for planeparallel chamber,0.6%-2.2% for cylindrical chamber,and 0.5%-2.0% for cross-calibrated chamber.The differences in measured absorbed doses between the two dosimetry protocols were slight.Conclusions The methods used to determine absorbed dose to water recommanded by IAEA TRS-398 for high-energy beams are more accurate and more suitable for clinical users to measure compared to the TRS-277. Key words: Radiotherapy;  Dosimetry;  Absorbed dose;  Ionization chamber

Key concepts: Absorbed dose, Ionization chamber, Dosimetry, Nuclear medicine, Electron, Cathode ray, Beam (structure), Physics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of the absorbed dose measurement methods for high-energy electron beams — Research Paper | ScholarLens