2016•Zhonghua xiandai huli zazhiRequires access

Analysis on the reliability and validity of Chinese version of good death inventory

Tieying Zeng, Qiuting Mao

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Objective To translate the English version of good death inventory(GDI) into Chinese, and test its reliability and validity among medical staff and general people in China. Methods The English version of GDI was translated and revised, and was used to investigate 595 people. The reliability and validity were tested. Results The Chinese version of good death scale consisted of 18 items, and three factors were extracted. The cumulative proportion in anova was 52.890%, and the factor loading of every item was greater than 0.3. The correlated coefficients between items and their sub-scales ranged from 0.558 to 0.778. The Cronbach′s α coefficient of the scale was 0.894, and split-half reliability coefficient was 0.787. Conclusions Revised Chinese version of GDI has good reliability and validity, and it can be used for measuring the level of medical staff and general people in China. Key words: Good death; Expectation; Reliability; Validity

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To translate the English version of good death inventory(GDI) into Chinese, and test its reliability and validity among medical staff and general people in China. Methods The English version of GDI was translated and revised, and was used to investigate 595 people. The reliability and validity were tested. Results The Chinese version of good death scale consisted of 18 items, and three factors were extracted. The cumulative proportion in anova was 52.890%, and the factor loading of every item was greater than 0.3. The correlated coefficients between items and their sub-scales ranged from 0.558 to 0.778. The Cronbach′s α coefficient of the scale was 0.894, and split-half reliability coefficient was 0.787. Conclusions Revised Chinese version of GDI has good reliability and validity, and it can be used for measuring the level of medical staff and general people in China. Key words: Good death; Expectation; Reliability; Validity

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To translate the English version of good death inventory(GDI) into Chinese, and test its reliability and validity among medical staff and general people in China. Methods The English version of GDI was translated and revised, and was used to investigate 595 people. The reliability and validity were tested. Results The Chinese version of good death scale consisted of 18 items, and three factors were extracted. The cumulative proportion in anova was 52.890%, and the factor loading of every item was greater than 0.3. The correlated coefficients between items and their sub-scales ranged from 0.558 to 0.778. The Cronbach′s α coefficient of the scale was 0.894, and split-half reliability coefficient was 0.787. Conclusions Revised Chinese version of GDI has good reliability and validity, and it can be used for measuring the level of medical staff and general people in China. Key words: Good death; Expectation; Reliability; Validity

Key concepts: Cronbach's alpha, Reliability (semiconductor), Scale (ratio), Psychology, Validity, Test (biology), Statistics, Chinese people

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Analysis on the reliability and validity of Chinese version of good death inventory — Research Paper | ScholarLens