2008•Zhonghua fangshe yixue yu fanghu zazhiRequires access

Amorphous selenium flat-panel detector digital radiography versus computed radiography: phantom study of depiction of simulated lesion and dose reduction

Yongming Zeng, Zhiwei Zhang, Yang-yu Ou

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare an amorphous selenium fiat-panel detector digital radiography(DR) with a computed radiography(CR) for the depiction of simulated pulmonary lesion,as well as for evaluation of dose reduction.Methods Simulated linear,reticular,and nodular lesion were located in all anthropomorphic chest phantom.The phantom was exposed by DR and CR with different mAs sets.The entrance surface doses were recorded for all images.Hard copy images were generated at different dose levels.Images were presented in a random order to four independent radiologists.They subjectively rated the visibility of simulated pulmonary lesion. Statistical significance of difference was analvsed with wilcoxon test.Resuits The visibility of simulated linear and reticular lesions on the images obtained with DR was superior to the images from CR at 2.0 and 3.2 mAs.P 0.05).DR was superior to CR in detection sinail nodular(diameter<10 mm)lesions at different dose level(mAs:2.0,3.2,5.0,6.3),P<0.05(Z=-2.237, P=0.018;Z=-2.384,P=0.017;Z=-2.388,P=0.017;Z=-2.366,P=0.018).When the visibility of simulated pulmonary lesion for DR and CR were equal,The radiation dose was reduce approximately 65% with the DR.Conclusious DR was superior to CR in depiction of tiny lesion and dose reduction greatly. Key words: Digital Radiography;  Simulated Lesion;  Chest Phantom;  Radiation Dose

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare an amorphous selenium fiat-panel detector digital radiography(DR) with a computed radiography(CR) for the depiction of simulated pulmonary lesion,as well as for evaluation of dose reduction.Methods Simulated linear,reticular,and nodular lesion were located in all anthropomorphic chest phantom.The phantom was exposed by DR and CR with different mAs sets.The entrance surface doses were recorded for all images.Hard copy images were generated at different dose levels.Images were presented in a random order to four independent radiologists.They subjectively rated the visibility of simulated pulmonary lesion. Statistical significance of difference was analvsed with wilcoxon test.Resuits The visibility of simulated linear and reticular lesions on the images obtained with DR was superior to the images from CR at 2.0 and 3.2 mAs.P 0.05).DR was superior to CR in detection sinail nodular(diameter<10 mm)lesions at different dose level(mAs:2.0,3.2,5.0,6.3),P<0.05(Z=-2.237, P=0.018;Z=-2.384,P=0.017;Z=-2.388,P=0.017;Z=-2.366,P=0.018).When the visibility of simulated pulmonary lesion for DR and CR were equal,The radiation dose was reduce approximately 65% with the DR.Conclusious DR was superior to CR in depiction of tiny lesion and dose reduction greatly. Key words: Digital Radiography;  Simulated Lesion;  Chest Phantom;  Radiation Dose

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare an amorphous selenium fiat-panel detector digital radiography(DR) with a computed radiography(CR) for the depiction of simulated pulmonary lesion,as well as for evaluation of dose reduction.Methods Simulated linear,reticular,and nodular lesion were located in all anthropomorphic chest phantom.The phantom was exposed by DR and CR with different mAs sets.The entrance surface doses were recorded for all images.Hard copy images were generated at different dose levels.Images were presented in a random order to four independent radiologists.They subjectively rated the visibility of simulated pulmonary lesion. Statistical significance of difference was analvsed with wilcoxon test.Resuits The visibility of simulated linear and reticular lesions on the images obtained with DR was superior to the images from CR at 2.0 and 3.2 mAs.P 0.05).DR was superior to CR in detection sinail nodular(diameter<10 mm)lesions at different dose level(mAs:2.0,3.2,5.0,6.3),P<0.05(Z=-2.237, P=0.018;Z=-2.384,P=0.017;Z=-2.388,P=0.017;Z=-2.366,P=0.018).When the visibility of simulated pulmonary lesion for DR and CR were equal,The radiation dose was reduce approximately 65% with the DR.Conclusious DR was superior to CR in depiction of tiny lesion and dose reduction greatly. Key words: Digital Radiography;  Simulated Lesion;  Chest Phantom;  Radiation Dose

Key concepts: Imaging phantom, Radiography, Digital radiography, Nuclear medicine, Lesion, Flat panel detector, Medicine, Visibility

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Amorphous selenium flat-panel detector digital radiography versus computed radiography: phantom study of depiction of simulated lesion and dose reduction — Research Paper | ScholarLens