ScholarLens Back to search
2003•国际医药卫生导报Requires access

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CT AND PATHOLOGY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ABDOMINAL MASSES:ANALYSIS OF 360 CASES

刘丽平, 黄光辉, 刘城林

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

目的分析腥部肿块的CT诊断准确性,并与病理诊断作比较,探讨CT误诊的原因.方法将360例腹部肿块患者CT诊断后行手术,经病理诊断将其分为恶性肿瘤、良性肿瘤、炎症三大类,对CT与病理诊断进行比较分析.结果腹部肿块的CT诊断总体符合率为90.83%,误诊率为9.17%.结论CT与病理有很强的互补性,应重视病史并作出综合分析,以提高CT诊断的准确性.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

目的分析腥部肿块的CT诊断准确性,并与病理诊断作比较,探讨CT误诊的原因.方法将360例腹部肿块患者CT诊断后行手术,经病理诊断将其分为恶性肿瘤、良性肿瘤、炎症三大类,对CT与病理诊断进行比较分析.结果腹部肿块的CT诊断总体符合率为90.83%,误诊率为9.17%.结论CT与病理有很强的互补性,应重视病史并作出综合分析,以提高CT诊断的准确性.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

目的分析腥部肿块的CT诊断准确性,并与病理诊断作比较,探讨CT误诊的原因.方法将360例腹部肿块患者CT诊断后行手术,经病理诊断将其分为恶性肿瘤、良性肿瘤、炎症三大类,对CT与病理诊断进行比较分析.结果腹部肿块的CT诊断总体符合率为90.83%,误诊率为9.17%.结论CT与病理有很强的互补性,应重视病史并作出综合分析,以提高CT诊断的准确性.

Key concepts: Medicine, Pathology, Radiology

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CT AND PATHOLOGY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ABDOMINAL MASSES:ANALYSIS OF 360 CASES — Research Paper | ScholarLens