2011Chinese Journal of OrthodonticsRequires access

Therapeutic Comparison of Two Oral Appliances on Obstructive Sleep Apnea/Hypopnea Syndrome

Yuehua Liu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the objective and subjective effects of two oral appliances in patients with OSAHS.Methods A crossover design trial was carried out in 16 OSAHS patients who wore mono-block and two-piece appliances in turn.Each oral appliance needed to be worn for 3 months.There was a two-week washout period between appliance switch.The objective and subjective effects were assessed at the end of wearing oral appliance.One-way ANOVA was carried out to evaluate the parameters.Results Both oral appliances showed remarkable efficacy in OSAHS patients.But the mono-block appliance had less improvement in Sleep Efficiency(SE) and Percentage of Delta period( Delta% )(P<0.05).Both oral appliances could increase obviously the each segment of upper airway(P<0.05).But there was no significant difference between the two oral appliances(P >0.05).Conclusions Both oral appliances had good efficacies in the treatment of OSAHS.Due to the different characteristics of each appliance,there were more alternatives for OSAHS patients. Key words: obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome;  mono-block oral appliance;  twopiece oral appliance;  upper airway;  objective and subjective effects

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the objective and subjective effects of two oral appliances in patients with OSAHS.Methods A crossover design trial was carried out in 16 OSAHS patients who wore mono-block and two-piece appliances in turn.Each oral appliance needed to be worn for 3 months.There was a two-week washout period between appliance switch.The objective and subjective effects were assessed at the end of wearing oral appliance.One-way ANOVA was carried out to evaluate the parameters.Results Both oral appliances showed remarkable efficacy in OSAHS patients.But the mono-block appliance had less improvement in Sleep Efficiency(SE) and Percentage of Delta period( Delta% )(P<0.05).Both oral appliances could increase obviously the each segment of upper airway(P<0.05).But there was no significant difference between the two oral appliances(P >0.05).Conclusions Both oral appliances had good efficacies in the treatment of OSAHS.Due to the different characteristics of each appliance,there were more alternatives for OSAHS patients. Key words: obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome;  mono-block oral appliance;  twopiece oral appliance;  upper airway;  objective and subjective effects

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the objective and subjective effects of two oral appliances in patients with OSAHS.Methods A crossover design trial was carried out in 16 OSAHS patients who wore mono-block and two-piece appliances in turn.Each oral appliance needed to be worn for 3 months.There was a two-week washout period between appliance switch.The objective and subjective effects were assessed at the end of wearing oral appliance.One-way ANOVA was carried out to evaluate the parameters.Results Both oral appliances showed remarkable efficacy in OSAHS patients.But the mono-block appliance had less improvement in Sleep Efficiency(SE) and Percentage of Delta period( Delta% )(P<0.05).Both oral appliances could increase obviously the each segment of upper airway(P<0.05).But there was no significant difference between the two oral appliances(P >0.05).Conclusions Both oral appliances had good efficacies in the treatment of OSAHS.Due to the different characteristics of each appliance,there were more alternatives for OSAHS patients. Key words: obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome;  mono-block oral appliance;  twopiece oral appliance;  upper airway;  objective and subjective effects

Key concepts: Oral appliance, Medicine, Hypopnea, Obstructive sleep apnea, Crossover study, Anesthesia, Airway, Apnea

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Therapeutic Comparison of Two Oral Appliances on Obstructive Sleep Apnea/Hypopnea Syndrome — Research Paper | ScholarLens