2013Zhonghua mazuixue zazhiRequires access

Effects of different doses of dexmedetomidine on propofol-induced inhibition of responses to laryngeal mask airway insertion when combined with fentanyl in patients undergoing gynecological operation

Shuangyan Hu, Junfeng Zhong, Zongming Jiang, Jun Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the effects of different doses of dexmedetomidine on propofol-induced inhibition of responses to laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion when combined with fentanyl in patients undergo- ing gynecological operation. Methods One hundred and twenty-five ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ female patients, aged 20-60 yr, scheduled for elective short-time surgery, were randomly divided into 5 groups ( n = 25 each) : normal saline group (group NS) and different doses of dexmedetomidne groups (groups D1-4 ). Normal saline 40 ml and dexmedeto- midne 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0 μg/kg (in 40 ml of normal saline) were infused over 10 min in groups NS and D1-4 re- spectively. 1% propofol was then given by target-controlled infusion. The concentration of propofol was determined by using modified Dixon's up-and-down method. The initial plasma concentration of propofol was 3.0 μg/ml and the ratio between the 2 successive concentrations was 1.1. Fentanyl 1. 5μg/kg was injected intravenously when the effect-site concentration of propofol reached the preset plasma concentration. LMA was inserted 4 min later. When LMA insertion was successful, the concentration of propofol was decreased in the next patient and when LMA inser- tion failed, the concentration of propofol was increased in the next patient. Failure of LMA insertion was defined asdifficulty in inserting LMA or body movement, corner of mouth movement, biting LMA, swallowing and/or lacrima- tion during insertion. The median effective target effect-site concentration and 95 % confidence interval of propofol blunting responses to LMA insertion when combined with fentanyl were calculated. Results The median effective target effect-site concentration (95% confidence interval) of propofol blunting responses to LMA insertion when combined with fentanyl were 3.09 (2.83-3.36), 2.48 (2.26-2.73), 2.29 (2.18-2.41), 2.04 (1.95-2.12) and 1.67 (1.55-1.81 )μg/ml in groups NS and D].4 , respectively. Conclusion Dexmedetomidine can enhance propo- fol-induced inhibition of responses to LMA insertion when combined with fentanyl in dose-dependent manner in pa- tients undergoing gynecological operation. Key words: Dexmedetomidine ;  Propofol ;  Piperidines ;  Dose-response relationship, drug ;  Laryngeal masks;  Gynecologic surgical procedures

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the effects of different doses of dexmedetomidine on propofol-induced inhibition of responses to laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion when combined with fentanyl in patients undergo- ing gynecological operation. Methods One hundred and twenty-five ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ female patients, aged 20-60 yr, scheduled for elective short-time surgery, were randomly divided into 5 groups ( n = 25 each) : normal saline group (group NS) and different doses of dexmedetomidne groups (groups D1-4 ). Normal saline 40 ml and dexmedeto- midne 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0 μg/kg (in 40 ml of normal saline) were infused over 10 min in groups NS and D1-4 re- spectively. 1% propofol was then given by target-controlled infusion. The concentration of propofol was determined by using modified Dixon's up-and-down method. The initial plasma concentration of propofol was 3.0 μg/ml and the ratio between the 2 successive concentrations was 1.1. Fentanyl 1. 5μg/kg was injected intravenously when the effect-site concentration of propofol reached the preset plasma concentration. LMA was inserted 4 min later. When LMA insertion was successful, the concentration of propofol was decreased in the next patient and when LMA inser- tion failed, the concentration of propofol was increased in the next patient. Failure of LMA insertion was defined asdifficulty in inserting LMA or body movement, corner of mouth movement, biting LMA, swallowing and/or lacrima- tion during insertion. The median effective target effect-site concentration and 95 % confidence interval of propofol blunting responses to LMA insertion when combined with fentanyl were calculated. Results The median effective target effect-site concentration (95% confidence interval) of propofol blunting responses to LMA insertion when combined with fentanyl were 3.09 (2.83-3.36), 2.48 (2.26-2.73), 2.29 (2.18-2.41), 2.04 (1.95-2.12) and 1.67 (1.55-1.81 )μg/ml in groups NS and D].4 , respectively. Conclusion Dexmedetomidine can enhance propo- fol-induced inhibition of responses to LMA insertion when combined with fentanyl in dose-dependent manner in pa- tients undergoing gynecological operation. Key words: Dexmedetomidine ;  Propofol ;  Piperidines ;  Dose-response relationship, drug ;  Laryngeal masks;  Gynecologic surgical procedures

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the effects of different doses of dexmedetomidine on propofol-induced inhibition of responses to laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion when combined with fentanyl in patients undergo- ing gynecological operation. Methods One hundred and twenty-five ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ female patients, aged 20-60 yr, scheduled for elective short-time surgery, were randomly divided into 5 groups ( n = 25 each) : normal saline group (group NS) and different doses of dexmedetomidne groups (groups D1-4 ). Normal saline 40 ml and dexmedeto- midne 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0 μg/kg (in 40 ml of normal saline) were infused over 10 min in groups NS and D1-4 re- spectively. 1% propofol was then given by target-controlled infusion. The concentration of propofol was determined by using modified Dixon's up-and-down method. The initial plasma concentration of propofol was 3.0 μg/ml and the ratio between the 2 successive concentrations was 1.1. Fentanyl 1. 5μg/kg was injected intravenously when the effect-site concentration of propofol reached the preset plasma concentration. LMA was inserted 4 min later. When LMA insertion was successful, the concentration of propofol was decreased in the next patient and when LMA inser- tion failed, the concentration of propofol was increased in the next patient. Failure of LMA insertion was defined asdifficulty in inserting LMA or body movement, corner of mouth movement, biting LMA, swallowing and/or lacrima- tion during insertion. The median effective target effect-site concentration and 95 % confidence interval of propofol blunting responses to LMA insertion when combined with fentanyl were calculated. Results The median effective target effect-site concentration (95% confidence interval) of propofol blunting responses to LMA insertion when combined with fentanyl were 3.09 (2.83-3.36), 2.48 (2.26-2.73), 2.29 (2.18-2.41), 2.04 (1.95-2.12) and 1.67 (1.55-1.81 )μg/ml in groups NS and D].4 , respectively. Conclusion Dexmedetomidine can enhance propo- fol-induced inhibition of responses to LMA insertion when combined with fentanyl in dose-dependent manner in pa- tients undergoing gynecological operation. Key words: Dexmedetomidine ;  Propofol ;  Piperidines ;  Dose-response relationship, drug ;  Laryngeal masks;  Gynecologic surgical procedures

Key concepts: Propofol, Laryngeal mask airway, Medicine, Dexmedetomidine, Anesthesia, Fentanyl, Saline, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effects of different doses of dexmedetomidine on propofol-induced inhibition of responses to laryngeal mask airway insertion when combined with fentanyl in patients undergoing gynecological operation — Research Paper | ScholarLens