2015Zhonghua fangshexian yixue zazhiRequires access

Application of iterative model reconstruction iterative reconstruction in cardiac CT imaging——an animal experimental study

Jun Jiang, Meiping Huang, Yi Lei, Chang-Hong Liang, Jian Zhuang, Jinglei Li, Hui Liu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the value of iterative modal reconstruction (IMR) for reducing radiation dose and controlling image quality in cardiac CT. Methods Ten pigs were included. All pigs were scanned on a 256-slice prospectively ECG-gated cardiac CT utilizing routine dose (group A) and tube current reduced by 30% (group B), 50% (group C) and 70% (group D), respectively. Filtered back projection (FBP), hybrid iterative reconstruction (iDose4) and IMR were used for all data, respectively. Image noise and contrast- to- noise ratio (CNR) of ascending aortic root were measured, while overall image quality and coronary artery image quality was rated (five point scale). All results reconstructed by FBP, iDose4 and IMR were compared. Objective measurements were compared with one-way analysis of variance, and subjective assessments were compared withKruskal-Wallis H test and χ2 test. Results Compared with that of FBP and iDose4, image noise of IMR was (15.1±6.1) , (18.8±5.5) , (22.1±4.8) and (33.0±4.0) HU, respectively in group A, B, C and D with significant reduction (F=82.77, 90.71, 96.59, 95.51 respectively, allP 0.05) in the diagnosis rates of proximal coronary arteries compared with that using FBP and iDose4, while group C (100%, 40/40) and group D(92%, 37/40) had significantly increased diagnosis rates (χ2=20.05, 45.72, bothP<0.01). The diagnosis rates of distal coronary arteries of IMR reconstruction which were 100%(50/50), 98%(49/50), 90%(45/50), 78%(39/50), respectively in groups A, B, C, D had significant increase compared with that of FBP and iDose4 reconstruction (χ2=7.39, 16.75, 34.62, 81.33, allP<0.05). Conclusions IMR can significantly reduce image noise, improve CNR and image quality compared with iDose4. Application of IMR can reduce radiation dose but without compromising image quality. Key words: Heart; Imaging processing, computer assisted; Tomography, X-ray computed; Radiation dosage

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the value of iterative modal reconstruction (IMR) for reducing radiation dose and controlling image quality in cardiac CT. Methods Ten pigs were included. All pigs were scanned on a 256-slice prospectively ECG-gated cardiac CT utilizing routine dose (group A) and tube current reduced by 30% (group B), 50% (group C) and 70% (group D), respectively. Filtered back projection (FBP), hybrid iterative reconstruction (iDose4) and IMR were used for all data, respectively. Image noise and contrast- to- noise ratio (CNR) of ascending aortic root were measured, while overall image quality and coronary artery image quality was rated (five point scale). All results reconstructed by FBP, iDose4 and IMR were compared. Objective measurements were compared with one-way analysis of variance, and subjective assessments were compared withKruskal-Wallis H test and χ2 test. Results Compared with that of FBP and iDose4, image noise of IMR was (15.1±6.1) , (18.8±5.5) , (22.1±4.8) and (33.0±4.0) HU, respectively in group A, B, C and D with significant reduction (F=82.77, 90.71, 96.59, 95.51 respectively, allP 0.05) in the diagnosis rates of proximal coronary arteries compared with that using FBP and iDose4, while group C (100%, 40/40) and group D(92%, 37/40) had significantly increased diagnosis rates (χ2=20.05, 45.72, bothP<0.01). The diagnosis rates of distal coronary arteries of IMR reconstruction which were 100%(50/50), 98%(49/50), 90%(45/50), 78%(39/50), respectively in groups A, B, C, D had significant increase compared with that of FBP and iDose4 reconstruction (χ2=7.39, 16.75, 34.62, 81.33, allP<0.05). Conclusions IMR can significantly reduce image noise, improve CNR and image quality compared with iDose4. Application of IMR can reduce radiation dose but without compromising image quality. Key words: Heart; Imaging processing, computer assisted; Tomography, X-ray computed; Radiation dosage

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the value of iterative modal reconstruction (IMR) for reducing radiation dose and controlling image quality in cardiac CT. Methods Ten pigs were included. All pigs were scanned on a 256-slice prospectively ECG-gated cardiac CT utilizing routine dose (group A) and tube current reduced by 30% (group B), 50% (group C) and 70% (group D), respectively. Filtered back projection (FBP), hybrid iterative reconstruction (iDose4) and IMR were used for all data, respectively. Image noise and contrast- to- noise ratio (CNR) of ascending aortic root were measured, while overall image quality and coronary artery image quality was rated (five point scale). All results reconstructed by FBP, iDose4 and IMR were compared. Objective measurements were compared with one-way analysis of variance, and subjective assessments were compared withKruskal-Wallis H test and χ2 test. Results Compared with that of FBP and iDose4, image noise of IMR was (15.1±6.1) , (18.8±5.5) , (22.1±4.8) and (33.0±4.0) HU, respectively in group A, B, C and D with significant reduction (F=82.77, 90.71, 96.59, 95.51 respectively, allP 0.05) in the diagnosis rates of proximal coronary arteries compared with that using FBP and iDose4, while group C (100%, 40/40) and group D(92%, 37/40) had significantly increased diagnosis rates (χ2=20.05, 45.72, bothP<0.01). The diagnosis rates of distal coronary arteries of IMR reconstruction which were 100%(50/50), 98%(49/50), 90%(45/50), 78%(39/50), respectively in groups A, B, C, D had significant increase compared with that of FBP and iDose4 reconstruction (χ2=7.39, 16.75, 34.62, 81.33, allP<0.05). Conclusions IMR can significantly reduce image noise, improve CNR and image quality compared with iDose4. Application of IMR can reduce radiation dose but without compromising image quality. Key words: Heart; Imaging processing, computer assisted; Tomography, X-ray computed; Radiation dosage

Key concepts: Medicine, Iterative reconstruction, Image noise, Image quality, Nuclear medicine, Coronary arteries, Radiation dose, Artery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Application of iterative model reconstruction iterative reconstruction in cardiac CT imaging——an animal experimental study — Research Paper | ScholarLens