2018Zhonghua chaosheng yingxiangxue zazhiRequires access

Dissipative energy loss within the left ventricle detected by vector flow mapping in dilated cardiomyopathy patients

Yuyan Cai, Xin Wei, Liping Chen, Guyue Liu, Xiaodong Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To quantitatively analyze the energy loss (EL) of the left ventricle in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) by vector flow mapping (VFM). Methods Sixty-four DCM patients confirmed by clinical were enrolled and divided into three groups according to the level of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF): mild decreased LVEF group(group A, 40%≤LVEF<50%), moderate decreased LVEF group(group B, 30%≤LVEF<40%) and severe decreased LVEF group ( group C, LVEF<30%). Forty healthy volunteers were selected as control group (group D, 53%≤LVEF≤73%) for physical examination. The images of apical four-chamber and three-chamber in color Doppler echocardiography were acquired and EL was analyzed in different phases in a cardiac cycle. Results There was no significant difference of the EL in isovolumic systole and isovolumic diastole between DCM groups and the control group (P>0.05). In rapid and slow ejection period, the EL in group B and C were much lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). In rapid filling phase, the EL in DCM groups were much lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). While in slow filling period and atrial systole the EL in group C was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusions VFM provides a new perspective for the cardiac function study of DCM patients. Key words: Echocardiography; Cardiomyopathy, dilated; Ventricular function, left; Vector flow mapping; Energy loss

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To quantitatively analyze the energy loss (EL) of the left ventricle in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) by vector flow mapping (VFM). Methods Sixty-four DCM patients confirmed by clinical were enrolled and divided into three groups according to the level of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF): mild decreased LVEF group(group A, 40%≤LVEF<50%), moderate decreased LVEF group(group B, 30%≤LVEF<40%) and severe decreased LVEF group ( group C, LVEF<30%). Forty healthy volunteers were selected as control group (group D, 53%≤LVEF≤73%) for physical examination. The images of apical four-chamber and three-chamber in color Doppler echocardiography were acquired and EL was analyzed in different phases in a cardiac cycle. Results There was no significant difference of the EL in isovolumic systole and isovolumic diastole between DCM groups and the control group (P>0.05). In rapid and slow ejection period, the EL in group B and C were much lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). In rapid filling phase, the EL in DCM groups were much lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). While in slow filling period and atrial systole the EL in group C was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusions VFM provides a new perspective for the cardiac function study of DCM patients. Key words: Echocardiography; Cardiomyopathy, dilated; Ventricular function, left; Vector flow mapping; Energy loss

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To quantitatively analyze the energy loss (EL) of the left ventricle in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) by vector flow mapping (VFM). Methods Sixty-four DCM patients confirmed by clinical were enrolled and divided into three groups according to the level of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF): mild decreased LVEF group(group A, 40%≤LVEF<50%), moderate decreased LVEF group(group B, 30%≤LVEF<40%) and severe decreased LVEF group ( group C, LVEF<30%). Forty healthy volunteers were selected as control group (group D, 53%≤LVEF≤73%) for physical examination. The images of apical four-chamber and three-chamber in color Doppler echocardiography were acquired and EL was analyzed in different phases in a cardiac cycle. Results There was no significant difference of the EL in isovolumic systole and isovolumic diastole between DCM groups and the control group (P>0.05). In rapid and slow ejection period, the EL in group B and C were much lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). In rapid filling phase, the EL in DCM groups were much lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). While in slow filling period and atrial systole the EL in group C was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusions VFM provides a new perspective for the cardiac function study of DCM patients. Key words: Echocardiography; Cardiomyopathy, dilated; Ventricular function, left; Vector flow mapping; Energy loss

Key concepts: Ejection fraction, Medicine, Dilated cardiomyopathy, Cardiology, Ventricle, Internal medicine, Systole, Cardiomyopathy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Dissipative energy loss within the left ventricle detected by vector flow mapping in dilated cardiomyopathy patients — Research Paper | ScholarLens