Clinical application of adaptive support ventilation in weaning patients after general anesthesia
章文豪, 袁受涛, 郑曙云, 穆心苇
Abstract
章文豪, 袁受涛, 郑曙云, 穆心苇
Abstract
Objective To compare the different characteristics of adaptive support ventilation (ASV) and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation-pressure support ventilation (SIMV-PSV) mode in weaning patients after general anesthesia.Methods One hundred and twenty-eight patients received general anesthesia,ending in odd and even numbers by hospital number divided into ASV group (single number,62 cases) and SIMV-PSV group (double number,66 cases).The propofol dosage,duration of mechanical ventilation,duration of intubation,ventilator alarms,ventilator settings manipulations and each stage of the blood gas analysis,hemodynamic,respiratory mechanics were recorded.Results One hundred and twenty-eight patients completed the extubation.The propofol dosage,duration of mechanical ventilation,duration of intubation in ASV group were significantly shorter than those in SIMV-PSV group [(1.13 ± 0.33)mg/kg vs.(1.28 ±0.49) mg/kg,(169.8±36.5) min vs.(201.9 ±37.3) min,(197.2 ±38.9) min vs.(239.5 ± 42.3) min,P < 0.05].There was no statistically significant difference in various stages of heart rate,mean arterial pressure,central venous pressure,pH,arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure,oxygenation index between two groups (P >0.05).In the first and second stages,tidal volume in ASV group was significantly higher than that in SIMV-PSV group [(543.6 ± 72.3) ml vs.(489.5 ± 68.7) ml,(513.9 ± 65.7)ml vs.(462.8 ± 61.7) ml,P< 0.05],respiratory rate in ASV group was significantly lower than that in SIMV-PSV group [(13.2 ± 3.6) times/min vs.(17.2 ±4.1) times/min,(15.1 ± 3.1) times/min vs.(16.8 ± 3.7)times/min,P < 0.05].In the first stage,the mean airway pressure and peak airway pressure in ASV group were significantly lower than those in SIMV-PSV group [(8.2 ± 1.7) cm H2O (1 cm H2O =0.098 kPa) vs.(12.3 ± 3.1) cm H2O,(16.2 ± 2.9) cm H2O vs.(21.2 ± 4.3) cm H2O,P < 0.05].The pulmonary dynamic compliance in ASV group was better than that in SIMV-PSV group [(64.8 ± 12.3) ml/cm H2O vs.(52.6 ±13.5) ml/cm H2O,P < 0.05].The ventilator alarms,ventilator settings manipulations in ASV group were significantly shorter than those in SIMV-PSV group [(2.3 ± 1.6) times vs.(5.1 ± 1.9) times,(0.8 ± 0.5) times vs.(1.6 ± 0.8) times,P < 0.05].Conclusion ASV weaning mode is safe and effective,which could accelerate the extubation and simplify the manipulation. Key words: Respiration,artificial; Anesthesia,general; Adaptive support ventilation; Weaning
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To compare the different characteristics of adaptive support ventilation (ASV) and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation-pressure support ventilation (SIMV-PSV) mode in weaning patients after general anesthesia.Methods One hundred and twenty-eight patients received general anesthesia,ending in odd and even numbers by hospital number divided into ASV group (single number,62 cases) and SIMV-PSV group (double number,66 cases).The propofol dosage,duration of mechanical ventilation,duration of intubation,ventilator alarms,ventilator settings manipulations and each stage of the blood gas analysis,hemodynamic,respiratory mechanics were recorded.Results One hundred and twenty-eight patients completed the extubation.The propofol dosage,duration of mechanical ventilation,duration of intubation in ASV group were significantly shorter than those in SIMV-PSV group [(1.13 ± 0.33)mg/kg vs.(1.28 ±0.49) mg/kg,(169.8±36.5) min vs.(201.9 ±37.3) min,(197.2 ±38.9) min vs.(239.5 ± 42.3) min,P < 0.05].There was no statistically significant difference in various stages of heart rate,mean arterial pressure,central venous pressure,pH,arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure,oxygenation index between two groups (P >0.05).In the first and second stages,tidal volume in ASV group was significantly higher than that in SIMV-PSV group [(543.6 ± 72.3) ml vs.(489.5 ± 68.7) ml,(513.9 ± 65.7)ml vs.(462.8 ± 61.7) ml,P< 0.05],respiratory rate in ASV group was significantly lower than that in SIMV-PSV group [(13.2 ± 3.6) times/min vs.(17.2 ±4.1) times/min,(15.1 ± 3.1) times/min vs.(16.8 ± 3.7)times/min,P < 0.05].In the first stage,the mean airway pressure and peak airway pressure in ASV group were significantly lower than those in SIMV-PSV group [(8.2 ± 1.7) cm H2O (1 cm H2O =0.098 kPa) vs.(12.3 ± 3.1) cm H2O,(16.2 ± 2.9) cm H2O vs.(21.2 ± 4.3) cm H2O,P < 0.05].The pulmonary dynamic compliance in ASV group was better than that in SIMV-PSV group [(64.8 ± 12.3) ml/cm H2O vs.(52.6 ±13.5) ml/cm H2O,P < 0.05].The ventilator alarms,ventilator settings manipulations in ASV group were significantly shorter than those in SIMV-PSV group [(2.3 ± 1.6) times vs.(5.1 ± 1.9) times,(0.8 ± 0.5) times vs.(1.6 ± 0.8) times,P < 0.05].Conclusion ASV weaning mode is safe and effective,which could accelerate the extubation and simplify the manipulation. Key words: Respiration,artificial; Anesthesia,general; Adaptive support ventilation; Weaning
Key concepts: Anesthesia, Medicine, Pressure support ventilation, Propofol, Mechanical ventilation, Ventilation (architecture), Intubation, Isoflurane