2016Chin J Anat ClinRequires access

Microsurgical anatomy of drilling posterior wall of the internal acoustic meatus using the suboccipital retrosigmoid approach

Zhijie Yin, Baozhe Jin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate anatomic characters and obtain microanatomic data for the application of the suboccipital approach drilling of the posterior wall of the internal acoustic meatus (IAM), in order to open the posterior meatal wall safely and fully. Methods Simulating the procedures of the suboccipital retrosigmoid approach, 12 sides of 6 cadaveric adult head specimens were dissected by using microsurgical anatomic skill, with the posterior meatal walls were drilled. Regard a point P as reference that located posterior to internal acoustic pore, the averaged minimum distances from P to the subarcuate fossae, the posterior semicircular canal, common crus, fundus of IAM, external aperture of vestibular, jugular foramen were measured with the vernier caliper, and then photos were taken. Results Using the posterior wall of IAM as reference plane, the angle between the stem and this plane was 47.3°±17.2°. The average minimum distance from P to the subarcuate fossae, the posterior semicircular canal, common crus, fundus of IAM, external aperture of vestibular, jugular foramen were(4.10±0.60)mm, (7.39±0.44)mm, (7.39±0.44)mm, (7.39±0.44)mm, (10.44±0.73)mm, and (7.35±1.09)mm, respectively. Conclusions To protect the posterior canal and common crus, the length of posterior meatal wall when stripping should be kept within 7 mm. Being familiar with the susceptible structures of the surgical anatomy, such as semicircular canal, external aperture of vestibular, jugular bulb, ect, those structures can be protected very well during microsurgery. Key words: Ear, inner; Internal auditory canal; Neuroma, acoustic; Suboccipital retrosigmoid approach; Microsurgery; Anatomy

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate anatomic characters and obtain microanatomic data for the application of the suboccipital approach drilling of the posterior wall of the internal acoustic meatus (IAM), in order to open the posterior meatal wall safely and fully. Methods Simulating the procedures of the suboccipital retrosigmoid approach, 12 sides of 6 cadaveric adult head specimens were dissected by using microsurgical anatomic skill, with the posterior meatal walls were drilled. Regard a point P as reference that located posterior to internal acoustic pore, the averaged minimum distances from P to the subarcuate fossae, the posterior semicircular canal, common crus, fundus of IAM, external aperture of vestibular, jugular foramen were measured with the vernier caliper, and then photos were taken. Results Using the posterior wall of IAM as reference plane, the angle between the stem and this plane was 47.3°±17.2°. The average minimum distance from P to the subarcuate fossae, the posterior semicircular canal, common crus, fundus of IAM, external aperture of vestibular, jugular foramen were(4.10±0.60)mm, (7.39±0.44)mm, (7.39±0.44)mm, (7.39±0.44)mm, (10.44±0.73)mm, and (7.35±1.09)mm, respectively. Conclusions To protect the posterior canal and common crus, the length of posterior meatal wall when stripping should be kept within 7 mm. Being familiar with the susceptible structures of the surgical anatomy, such as semicircular canal, external aperture of vestibular, jugular bulb, ect, those structures can be protected very well during microsurgery. Key words: Ear, inner; Internal auditory canal; Neuroma, acoustic; Suboccipital retrosigmoid approach; Microsurgery; Anatomy

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate anatomic characters and obtain microanatomic data for the application of the suboccipital approach drilling of the posterior wall of the internal acoustic meatus (IAM), in order to open the posterior meatal wall safely and fully. Methods Simulating the procedures of the suboccipital retrosigmoid approach, 12 sides of 6 cadaveric adult head specimens were dissected by using microsurgical anatomic skill, with the posterior meatal walls were drilled. Regard a point P as reference that located posterior to internal acoustic pore, the averaged minimum distances from P to the subarcuate fossae, the posterior semicircular canal, common crus, fundus of IAM, external aperture of vestibular, jugular foramen were measured with the vernier caliper, and then photos were taken. Results Using the posterior wall of IAM as reference plane, the angle between the stem and this plane was 47.3°±17.2°. The average minimum distance from P to the subarcuate fossae, the posterior semicircular canal, common crus, fundus of IAM, external aperture of vestibular, jugular foramen were(4.10±0.60)mm, (7.39±0.44)mm, (7.39±0.44)mm, (7.39±0.44)mm, (10.44±0.73)mm, and (7.35±1.09)mm, respectively. Conclusions To protect the posterior canal and common crus, the length of posterior meatal wall when stripping should be kept within 7 mm. Being familiar with the susceptible structures of the surgical anatomy, such as semicircular canal, external aperture of vestibular, jugular bulb, ect, those structures can be protected very well during microsurgery. Key words: Ear, inner; Internal auditory canal; Neuroma, acoustic; Suboccipital retrosigmoid approach; Microsurgery; Anatomy

Key concepts: Posterior Semicircular Canal, Anatomy, Semicircular canal, Medicine, Meatus, Cadaveric spasm, Calipers, Vestibular system

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Microsurgical anatomy of drilling posterior wall of the internal acoustic meatus using the suboccipital retrosigmoid approach — Research Paper | ScholarLens