2014Guoji yiyao weisheng daobaoRequires access

The study of endoscopic hemostatic metal clip combined with Epinephrine injection in the treatment of peptic ulcer hemorrhage

Yahui Zhang, Yi Qin Ouyang, Liyan Zhang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the effect and clinical value of endoscopic hemostatic metal clip combined with Epinephrine injection and endoscopic Epinephrine injection in the treatment of peptic ulcer hemorrhage.Methods 98 patients with peptic ulcer hemorrhage were randomly divided into group A (48 cases) and group B (50 cases).Group A was treated with endoscopic hemostatic metal clip combined with Epinephrine injection,while group B was only treated with endoscopic Epinephrine injection.Results The hemostatic rate and the stop bleeding rate in group A were both 95.83%,without significant differences compared with group B (P > 0.05).The rebleeding rate in group A was significantly lower than that in group B (6.25% vs.22.00%,P < 0.05).The emergency operation rates in group A and group B were 2.08% and 8.00% separately,without significant difference between two groups (P > 0.05).The hemostasis rate for Forrest Ⅰ a in group A was significant higher than that in group B (88.89% vs.40.00%,P < 0.05).Conclusion Endoscopic hemostatic metal clip combined with Epinephrine injection in the treatment of peptic ulcer hemorrhage can reduce rebleeding rate and improve hemostasis,which is a very safe and effective endoscopic hemostasis. Key words: Peptic ulcer;  Upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage;  Hemostatic metal clip;  Endoscopic injection

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the effect and clinical value of endoscopic hemostatic metal clip combined with Epinephrine injection and endoscopic Epinephrine injection in the treatment of peptic ulcer hemorrhage.Methods 98 patients with peptic ulcer hemorrhage were randomly divided into group A (48 cases) and group B (50 cases).Group A was treated with endoscopic hemostatic metal clip combined with Epinephrine injection,while group B was only treated with endoscopic Epinephrine injection.Results The hemostatic rate and the stop bleeding rate in group A were both 95.83%,without significant differences compared with group B (P > 0.05).The rebleeding rate in group A was significantly lower than that in group B (6.25% vs.22.00%,P < 0.05).The emergency operation rates in group A and group B were 2.08% and 8.00% separately,without significant difference between two groups (P > 0.05).The hemostasis rate for Forrest Ⅰ a in group A was significant higher than that in group B (88.89% vs.40.00%,P < 0.05).Conclusion Endoscopic hemostatic metal clip combined with Epinephrine injection in the treatment of peptic ulcer hemorrhage can reduce rebleeding rate and improve hemostasis,which is a very safe and effective endoscopic hemostasis. Key words: Peptic ulcer;  Upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage;  Hemostatic metal clip;  Endoscopic injection

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the effect and clinical value of endoscopic hemostatic metal clip combined with Epinephrine injection and endoscopic Epinephrine injection in the treatment of peptic ulcer hemorrhage.Methods 98 patients with peptic ulcer hemorrhage were randomly divided into group A (48 cases) and group B (50 cases).Group A was treated with endoscopic hemostatic metal clip combined with Epinephrine injection,while group B was only treated with endoscopic Epinephrine injection.Results The hemostatic rate and the stop bleeding rate in group A were both 95.83%,without significant differences compared with group B (P > 0.05).The rebleeding rate in group A was significantly lower than that in group B (6.25% vs.22.00%,P < 0.05).The emergency operation rates in group A and group B were 2.08% and 8.00% separately,without significant difference between two groups (P > 0.05).The hemostasis rate for Forrest Ⅰ a in group A was significant higher than that in group B (88.89% vs.40.00%,P < 0.05).Conclusion Endoscopic hemostatic metal clip combined with Epinephrine injection in the treatment of peptic ulcer hemorrhage can reduce rebleeding rate and improve hemostasis,which is a very safe and effective endoscopic hemostasis. Key words: Peptic ulcer;  Upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage;  Hemostatic metal clip;  Endoscopic injection

Key concepts: Medicine, Hemostasis, Epinephrine, Peptic ulcer, Group B, Anesthesia, Group A, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The study of endoscopic hemostatic metal clip combined with Epinephrine injection in the treatment of peptic ulcer hemorrhage — Research Paper | ScholarLens