2018•Unpublished venueRequires access

Comparison of efficacy and safety between entecavir versus adefovir dipivoxil in the treatment of HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B

Xiyuan Ji, Zhen Ma, Jianming Li, Qige Qi

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of entecavir versus adefovir dipivoxil in the treatment of HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Methods Ninety-six cases with HBeAg positive CHB were divided into ETV group and ADV group according to different medication.In addition to conventional treatment, ETV group received entecavir 0.5 mg/d, ADV group received adefovir dipivoxil 10 mg/d.HBV DNA negative conversion rate, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) recurrence rate and HBeAg negative conversion rate in 24 weeks, 48 weeks and 96 weeks were compared as well as the adverse reactions and liver function in 96 weeks. Results HBV DNA negative conversion rates in ETV group were significantly higher than those in ADV group in 24 weeks, 48 weeks and 96 weeks (24 weeks: 64.6%(31/48) vs.41.7%(20/48); 48 weeks: 83.3%(40/48) vs.52.1%(25/48); 96 weeks: 97.9%(47/48) vs.62.5%(30/48), χ2=5.06, 10.72, 18.96, P 0.05). There was no significant difference in HBeAg negative conversion rate between the two groups through treatment(χ2=0.07, 0.22, 0.44, P>0.05). After 96 weeks, ALT in both groups decreased significantly(t=13.56, 11.85, P 0.05). Conclusion Entecavir has a higher rate of HBV DNA negative conversion rate, ALT recurrence rate and HBeAg negative conversion rate in the treatment of HBeAg positive CHB.It is an ideal antiviral drug. Key words: Entecavir; Adefovir dipivoxil; HBeAg positive; Chronic hepatitis B; Efficacy

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of entecavir versus adefovir dipivoxil in the treatment of HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Methods Ninety-six cases with HBeAg positive CHB were divided into ETV group and ADV group according to different medication.In addition to conventional treatment, ETV group received entecavir 0.5 mg/d, ADV group received adefovir dipivoxil 10 mg/d.HBV DNA negative conversion rate, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) recurrence rate and HBeAg negative conversion rate in 24 weeks, 48 weeks and 96 weeks were compared as well as the adverse reactions and liver function in 96 weeks. Results HBV DNA negative conversion rates in ETV group were significantly higher than those in ADV group in 24 weeks, 48 weeks and 96 weeks (24 weeks: 64.6%(31/48) vs.41.7%(20/48); 48 weeks: 83.3%(40/48) vs.52.1%(25/48); 96 weeks: 97.9%(47/48) vs.62.5%(30/48), χ2=5.06, 10.72, 18.96, P 0.05). There was no significant difference in HBeAg negative conversion rate between the two groups through treatment(χ2=0.07, 0.22, 0.44, P>0.05). After 96 weeks, ALT in both groups decreased significantly(t=13.56, 11.85, P 0.05). Conclusion Entecavir has a higher rate of HBV DNA negative conversion rate, ALT recurrence rate and HBeAg negative conversion rate in the treatment of HBeAg positive CHB.It is an ideal antiviral drug. Key words: Entecavir; Adefovir dipivoxil; HBeAg positive; Chronic hepatitis B; Efficacy

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of entecavir versus adefovir dipivoxil in the treatment of HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Methods Ninety-six cases with HBeAg positive CHB were divided into ETV group and ADV group according to different medication.In addition to conventional treatment, ETV group received entecavir 0.5 mg/d, ADV group received adefovir dipivoxil 10 mg/d.HBV DNA negative conversion rate, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) recurrence rate and HBeAg negative conversion rate in 24 weeks, 48 weeks and 96 weeks were compared as well as the adverse reactions and liver function in 96 weeks. Results HBV DNA negative conversion rates in ETV group were significantly higher than those in ADV group in 24 weeks, 48 weeks and 96 weeks (24 weeks: 64.6%(31/48) vs.41.7%(20/48); 48 weeks: 83.3%(40/48) vs.52.1%(25/48); 96 weeks: 97.9%(47/48) vs.62.5%(30/48), χ2=5.06, 10.72, 18.96, P 0.05). There was no significant difference in HBeAg negative conversion rate between the two groups through treatment(χ2=0.07, 0.22, 0.44, P>0.05). After 96 weeks, ALT in both groups decreased significantly(t=13.56, 11.85, P 0.05). Conclusion Entecavir has a higher rate of HBV DNA negative conversion rate, ALT recurrence rate and HBeAg negative conversion rate in the treatment of HBeAg positive CHB.It is an ideal antiviral drug. Key words: Entecavir; Adefovir dipivoxil; HBeAg positive; Chronic hepatitis B; Efficacy

Key concepts: Adefovir, Entecavir, Gastroenterology, Medicine, Chronic hepatitis, HBeAg, Internal medicine, Hepatitis B

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of efficacy and safety between entecavir versus adefovir dipivoxil in the treatment of HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B — Research Paper | ScholarLens