2015Zhonghua jianyan yixue zazhiRequires access

Comparison of three methods for the genetic diagnosis of spinal muscular atrophy

Xiaoqing Zhang, Lili Wang, Yongguo Yu

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the value of PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP), real-time PCR and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) in the genetic diagnosis of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) and make laboratory support accessible to clinicians for the molecular diagnosis of SMA. Methods Methodological evaluation. Forty-one suspected SMA cases and 359 control individuals received in Shanghai Children′s Medical Centre from March 2013 to June 2014 were detected for the deletion of exon 7 and 8 in the survival motor neuron gene 1 (SMN 1) by PCR-RFLP, real-time PCR and MLPA, respectively. Then the results of the three methods were compared and the benefits and limitations of the three methods were evaluated. Results The result of real-time PCR was in complete agreement with that of MLPA, showing that 29 suspected cases harbored homozygous deletions of SMN1 and 1 case possessed heterozygous deletion. Among the homozygous deletions, 27 patients demonstrated absence of exon 7 and 8, and 2 cases demonstrated only the absence of exon 7. Meanwhile, both PCR-RFLP and MLPA analysis showed the same results that only 5 out of 395 control cases carried heterozygous deletion. As for cases without heterozygous deletions, PCR-RFLP demonstrated the same result with real-time PCR and MLPA but it missed all the heterozygous ones. Conclusions PCR-RFLP, the conventional SMA gene diagnosis method, was only capable of detecting homozygous deletion of exon 7 and/or 8 of SMN1, but was not as sensitive as to find out the carriers with heterozygous deletions. MLPA could detect the deletion and quantify the copy numbers of exon 7 and 8 of SMN1, efficiently, while the price was relatively high, which brings challenges for its application in the carrier screening of SMA. Compared with these two methods, real-time PCR with high throughput and low input was a rapid, accurate and economic method for the genetic diagnosis of SMA and carrier screening in large populations. (Chin J Lab Med, 2015, 38: 16-20) Key words: Spinal muscular atrophies of childhood; Polymorphism, restriction fragment length; Real-time polymerase chain reaction

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the value of PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP), real-time PCR and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) in the genetic diagnosis of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) and make laboratory support accessible to clinicians for the molecular diagnosis of SMA. Methods Methodological evaluation. Forty-one suspected SMA cases and 359 control individuals received in Shanghai Children′s Medical Centre from March 2013 to June 2014 were detected for the deletion of exon 7 and 8 in the survival motor neuron gene 1 (SMN 1) by PCR-RFLP, real-time PCR and MLPA, respectively. Then the results of the three methods were compared and the benefits and limitations of the three methods were evaluated. Results The result of real-time PCR was in complete agreement with that of MLPA, showing that 29 suspected cases harbored homozygous deletions of SMN1 and 1 case possessed heterozygous deletion. Among the homozygous deletions, 27 patients demonstrated absence of exon 7 and 8, and 2 cases demonstrated only the absence of exon 7. Meanwhile, both PCR-RFLP and MLPA analysis showed the same results that only 5 out of 395 control cases carried heterozygous deletion. As for cases without heterozygous deletions, PCR-RFLP demonstrated the same result with real-time PCR and MLPA but it missed all the heterozygous ones. Conclusions PCR-RFLP, the conventional SMA gene diagnosis method, was only capable of detecting homozygous deletion of exon 7 and/or 8 of SMN1, but was not as sensitive as to find out the carriers with heterozygous deletions. MLPA could detect the deletion and quantify the copy numbers of exon 7 and 8 of SMN1, efficiently, while the price was relatively high, which brings challenges for its application in the carrier screening of SMA. Compared with these two methods, real-time PCR with high throughput and low input was a rapid, accurate and economic method for the genetic diagnosis of SMA and carrier screening in large populations. (Chin J Lab Med, 2015, 38: 16-20) Key words: Spinal muscular atrophies of childhood; Polymorphism, restriction fragment length; Real-time polymerase chain reaction

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the value of PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP), real-time PCR and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) in the genetic diagnosis of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) and make laboratory support accessible to clinicians for the molecular diagnosis of SMA. Methods Methodological evaluation. Forty-one suspected SMA cases and 359 control individuals received in Shanghai Children′s Medical Centre from March 2013 to June 2014 were detected for the deletion of exon 7 and 8 in the survival motor neuron gene 1 (SMN 1) by PCR-RFLP, real-time PCR and MLPA, respectively. Then the results of the three methods were compared and the benefits and limitations of the three methods were evaluated. Results The result of real-time PCR was in complete agreement with that of MLPA, showing that 29 suspected cases harbored homozygous deletions of SMN1 and 1 case possessed heterozygous deletion. Among the homozygous deletions, 27 patients demonstrated absence of exon 7 and 8, and 2 cases demonstrated only the absence of exon 7. Meanwhile, both PCR-RFLP and MLPA analysis showed the same results that only 5 out of 395 control cases carried heterozygous deletion. As for cases without heterozygous deletions, PCR-RFLP demonstrated the same result with real-time PCR and MLPA but it missed all the heterozygous ones. Conclusions PCR-RFLP, the conventional SMA gene diagnosis method, was only capable of detecting homozygous deletion of exon 7 and/or 8 of SMN1, but was not as sensitive as to find out the carriers with heterozygous deletions. MLPA could detect the deletion and quantify the copy numbers of exon 7 and 8 of SMN1, efficiently, while the price was relatively high, which brings challenges for its application in the carrier screening of SMA. Compared with these two methods, real-time PCR with high throughput and low input was a rapid, accurate and economic method for the genetic diagnosis of SMA and carrier screening in large populations. (Chin J Lab Med, 2015, 38: 16-20) Key words: Spinal muscular atrophies of childhood; Polymorphism, restriction fragment length; Real-time polymerase chain reaction

Key concepts: Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, SMN1, Spinal muscular atrophy, Restriction fragment length polymorphism, Exon, SMA*, Biology, Molecular biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of three methods for the genetic diagnosis of spinal muscular atrophy — Research Paper | ScholarLens