2018Zhonghua fangshe zhongliuxue zazhiRequires access

Relationship between radiation-induced xerostomia and the volume of parotid glands exposed in radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Yang Liu, Jie Ma, Yunli Yang, Ling Li, Xiaodong Zhu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the relationship between the volume of parotid glands and radiation-induced xerostomia in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods A total of 199 patients with NPC who were admitted to our hospital from 2015 to 2016 were enrolled as subjects. According to the initial volume of parotid glands, all patients were divided into large parotid group and small parotid group. The incidence of xerostomia after radiotherapy and dosimetric parameters were compared between the two groups. Comparison of categorical data was made by χ2 test. Comparison of continuous data was made by t-test or nonparametric test. Comparison of dose-volume histogram index was made by nonparametric test. Results There was no difference in the severity of xerostomia between the two groups at 3 and 6 months after radiotherapy. At one year after radiotherapy, the large parotid group had significantly milder xerostomia than the small parotid group (P=0.035). The small parotid group had a higher dose delivered to both parotid glands than the large parotid group. There was no difference in the mean dose to the submandibular gland between the two groups. Conclusions The initial volume of parotid glands is one of the influencing factors for the grade of xerostomia after radiotherapy. Patients with large parotid glands have better recovery from xerostomia after radiotherapy than those with small parotid glands. For patients with small parotid glands, more attention should be paid to reducing the dose to protect parotid glands. Key words: Nasopharyngeal neoplasms/intensity-modulated radiotherapy; Radiation-induce dxerostomia; Dosimetry

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the relationship between the volume of parotid glands and radiation-induced xerostomia in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods A total of 199 patients with NPC who were admitted to our hospital from 2015 to 2016 were enrolled as subjects. According to the initial volume of parotid glands, all patients were divided into large parotid group and small parotid group. The incidence of xerostomia after radiotherapy and dosimetric parameters were compared between the two groups. Comparison of categorical data was made by χ2 test. Comparison of continuous data was made by t-test or nonparametric test. Comparison of dose-volume histogram index was made by nonparametric test. Results There was no difference in the severity of xerostomia between the two groups at 3 and 6 months after radiotherapy. At one year after radiotherapy, the large parotid group had significantly milder xerostomia than the small parotid group (P=0.035). The small parotid group had a higher dose delivered to both parotid glands than the large parotid group. There was no difference in the mean dose to the submandibular gland between the two groups. Conclusions The initial volume of parotid glands is one of the influencing factors for the grade of xerostomia after radiotherapy. Patients with large parotid glands have better recovery from xerostomia after radiotherapy than those with small parotid glands. For patients with small parotid glands, more attention should be paid to reducing the dose to protect parotid glands. Key words: Nasopharyngeal neoplasms/intensity-modulated radiotherapy; Radiation-induce dxerostomia; Dosimetry

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the relationship between the volume of parotid glands and radiation-induced xerostomia in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods A total of 199 patients with NPC who were admitted to our hospital from 2015 to 2016 were enrolled as subjects. According to the initial volume of parotid glands, all patients were divided into large parotid group and small parotid group. The incidence of xerostomia after radiotherapy and dosimetric parameters were compared between the two groups. Comparison of categorical data was made by χ2 test. Comparison of continuous data was made by t-test or nonparametric test. Comparison of dose-volume histogram index was made by nonparametric test. Results There was no difference in the severity of xerostomia between the two groups at 3 and 6 months after radiotherapy. At one year after radiotherapy, the large parotid group had significantly milder xerostomia than the small parotid group (P=0.035). The small parotid group had a higher dose delivered to both parotid glands than the large parotid group. There was no difference in the mean dose to the submandibular gland between the two groups. Conclusions The initial volume of parotid glands is one of the influencing factors for the grade of xerostomia after radiotherapy. Patients with large parotid glands have better recovery from xerostomia after radiotherapy than those with small parotid glands. For patients with small parotid glands, more attention should be paid to reducing the dose to protect parotid glands. Key words: Nasopharyngeal neoplasms/intensity-modulated radiotherapy; Radiation-induce dxerostomia; Dosimetry

Key concepts: Parotid gland, Medicine, Radiation therapy, Nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Nuclear medicine, Radiology, Urology, Pathology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Relationship between radiation-induced xerostomia and the volume of parotid glands exposed in radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma — Research Paper | ScholarLens