2001中华器官移植杂志Requires access

The detection of specific anti-HLA antibodies in recipients of renal transplant and its clinical application

李留洋, 胡丽娟, 林民专, 赵明, 李民, 黄先恩, 范礼佩

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate the effect of HLA-specific antibodies, population reactive antibody (PRA), on the outcome of renal allografts. Methods Serum PRA in the recipients with 897 case/times of renal transplantation was determined by using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with lambda antigen tray (LAT) and complement dependent lymphocytotoxicity (CDC) techniques with lambda cell tray (LCT) to compare their specificity and sensitivity. Results There were 121 recipients with positive PRA in 856 recipients of primary renal transplantation with the positive rate being 11%. PRA positive rate of the recipients in the 33 cases of second renal transplant and 8 cases of third renal transplant was 58% and 87% respectively (both P<0.001). Rejection rate of renal post-transplantation in the positive PRA recipients was 40% and only 17% in the negative PRA recipients (P<0.001). Graft survival rate was decreased significantly in the positive PRA group, especially in the highly sensitized recipients with PRA>40% the graft survival rate at 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-years were decreased by 24%, 38%, 57% and 56% respectively as comparing with that in the negative PRA group (all P<0.001). False-positive rate and false-negative rate of CDC-PRA in 319 serum samples were 3.8% and 3.1% respectively by blindly determination of PRA using ELISA compared with CDC techniques. Conclusion PRA determination was a sensitive indictor predicting the sensitivity status of the recipients and there were significant influence on graft survival and rejections.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate the effect of HLA-specific antibodies, population reactive antibody (PRA), on the outcome of renal allografts. Methods Serum PRA in the recipients with 897 case/times of renal transplantation was determined by using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with lambda antigen tray (LAT) and complement dependent lymphocytotoxicity (CDC) techniques with lambda cell tray (LCT) to compare their specificity and sensitivity. Results There were 121 recipients with positive PRA in 856 recipients of primary renal transplantation with the positive rate being 11%. PRA positive rate of the recipients in the 33 cases of second renal transplant and 8 cases of third renal transplant was 58% and 87% respectively (both P<0.001). Rejection rate of renal post-transplantation in the positive PRA recipients was 40% and only 17% in the negative PRA recipients (P<0.001). Graft survival rate was decreased significantly in the positive PRA group, especially in the highly sensitized recipients with PRA>40% the graft survival rate at 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-years were decreased by 24%, 38%, 57% and 56% respectively as comparing with that in the negative PRA group (all P<0.001). False-positive rate and false-negative rate of CDC-PRA in 319 serum samples were 3.8% and 3.1% respectively by blindly determination of PRA using ELISA compared with CDC techniques. Conclusion PRA determination was a sensitive indictor predicting the sensitivity status of the recipients and there were significant influence on graft survival and rejections.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate the effect of HLA-specific antibodies, population reactive antibody (PRA), on the outcome of renal allografts. Methods Serum PRA in the recipients with 897 case/times of renal transplantation was determined by using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with lambda antigen tray (LAT) and complement dependent lymphocytotoxicity (CDC) techniques with lambda cell tray (LCT) to compare their specificity and sensitivity. Results There were 121 recipients with positive PRA in 856 recipients of primary renal transplantation with the positive rate being 11%. PRA positive rate of the recipients in the 33 cases of second renal transplant and 8 cases of third renal transplant was 58% and 87% respectively (both P<0.001). Rejection rate of renal post-transplantation in the positive PRA recipients was 40% and only 17% in the negative PRA recipients (P<0.001). Graft survival rate was decreased significantly in the positive PRA group, especially in the highly sensitized recipients with PRA>40% the graft survival rate at 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-years were decreased by 24%, 38%, 57% and 56% respectively as comparing with that in the negative PRA group (all P<0.001). False-positive rate and false-negative rate of CDC-PRA in 319 serum samples were 3.8% and 3.1% respectively by blindly determination of PRA using ELISA compared with CDC techniques. Conclusion PRA determination was a sensitive indictor predicting the sensitivity status of the recipients and there were significant influence on graft survival and rejections.

Key concepts: Medicine, Transplantation, Internal medicine, Antibody, Gastroenterology, Panel reactive antibody, Urology, Kidney transplantation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The detection of specific anti-HLA antibodies in recipients of renal transplant and its clinical application — Research Paper | ScholarLens