2019The Proceedings of the Materials and Mechanics ConferenceOpen access

Fatigue limit in very high cycle fatigue of high-strength steel

Yoshiyuki Furuya

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

1011 cycles fatigue tests were conducted on high-strength steel to clarify a new fatigue limit in very high cycle regions. The new fatigue limit had not been confirmed by fatigue tests up to 1010 cycles, while our previous study suggested that the new fatigue limit was probably confirmed by those up to 1011 cycles. However, the 1011 cycles fatigue testing was challenging since it took 2 months even by using ultrasonic fatigue testing at 20 kHz. In this study, 3 specimens were tested beyond 1010 cycles. Although a test on a specimen was terminated at around 5 x 1010 cycles, 2 specimens reached 1011 cycles without failure. In other word, no specimen failed above 1010 cycles. These results demonstrated the existence of the new fatigue limit. The fractured specimens below 1010 cycles revealed internal fractures originating from oxidetype inclusions. When the specimens failed in very high cycle regions, clear ODAs (Optically Dark Areas) were observed on the fracture surfaces, while the ODAs were obscure in case of failure in conventional life regions. The runout specimens up to 1011 cycles were forcibly fatigue-fractured at higher stress amplitudes in the conventional life regions. As the result, the ODA was observed on the forcibly fatigue-fractured surface. This meant that small internal cracks existed in the runout specimens since the ODA was a trace of small internal crack growth. Namely, non-propagating cracks were the mechanism of the appearance of the new fatigue limit.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

1011 cycles fatigue tests were conducted on high-strength steel to clarify a new fatigue limit in very high cycle regions. The new fatigue limit had not been confirmed by fatigue tests up to 1010 cycles, while our previous study suggested that the new fatigue limit was probably confirmed by those up to 1011 cycles. However, the 1011 cycles fatigue testing was challenging since it took 2 months even by using ultrasonic fatigue testing at 20 kHz. In this study, 3 specimens were tested beyond 1010 cycles. Although a test on a specimen was terminated at around 5 x 1010 cycles, 2 specimens reached 1011 cycles without failure. In other word, no specimen failed above 1010 cycles. These results demonstrated the existence of the new fatigue limit. The fractured specimens below 1010 cycles revealed internal fractures originating from oxidetype inclusions. When the specimens failed in very high cycle regions, clear ODAs (Optically Dark Areas) were observed on the fracture surfaces, while the ODAs were obscure in case of failure in conventional life regions. The runout specimens up to 1011 cycles were forcibly fatigue-fractured at higher stress amplitudes in the conventional life regions. As the result, the ODA was observed on the forcibly fatigue-fractured surface. This meant that small internal cracks existed in the runout specimens since the ODA was a trace of small internal crack growth. Namely, non-propagating cracks were the mechanism of the appearance of the new fatigue limit.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

1011 cycles fatigue tests were conducted on high-strength steel to clarify a new fatigue limit in very high cycle regions. The new fatigue limit had not been confirmed by fatigue tests up to 1010 cycles, while our previous study suggested that the new fatigue limit was probably confirmed by those up to 1011 cycles. However, the 1011 cycles fatigue testing was challenging since it took 2 months even by using ultrasonic fatigue testing at 20 kHz. In this study, 3 specimens were tested beyond 1010 cycles. Although a test on a specimen was terminated at around 5 x 1010 cycles, 2 specimens reached 1011 cycles without failure. In other word, no specimen failed above 1010 cycles. These results demonstrated the existence of the new fatigue limit. The fractured specimens below 1010 cycles revealed internal fractures originating from oxidetype inclusions. When the specimens failed in very high cycle regions, clear ODAs (Optically Dark Areas) were observed on the fracture surfaces, while the ODAs were obscure in case of failure in conventional life regions. The runout specimens up to 1011 cycles were forcibly fatigue-fractured at higher stress amplitudes in the conventional life regions. As the result, the ODA was observed on the forcibly fatigue-fractured surface. This meant that small internal cracks existed in the runout specimens since the ODA was a trace of small internal crack growth. Namely, non-propagating cracks were the mechanism of the appearance of the new fatigue limit.

Key concepts: Fatigue limit, Fatigue testing, Materials science, Fracture (geology), Stress concentration, Stress (linguistics), Composite material, Fracture mechanics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Fatigue limit in very high cycle fatigue of high-strength steel — Research Paper | ScholarLens