2019PubMedRequires access

[Recognition and diagnosis in the intellectually impaired in mental health care].

Jeanet Grietje Nieuwenhuis

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recognition of intellectual abilities of a patient is essential for good treatment. However, this may be hard to achieve, even by experienced professionals. AIM: To educate professionals how to detect and diagnose intellectual impairment accompanied by an approximate knowledge on methods and pitfalls in establishing psychiatric diagnoses. METHOD: Several valid instruments for the screening of intellectual impairment in the Netherlands are described in conjunction with adjoining steps in the diagnostic process. RESULTS: To determine mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning by screening and testing intelligence and adaptive functioning, and by establishing an integrative diagnosis by including emotional as well as social level of functioning. Some pitfalls in the diagnostic process are discussed. CONCLUSION: Clinicians must be aware which tools to use to determine broad functioning of the patient and which further steps are necessary for a good diagnosis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Recognition of intellectual abilities of a patient is essential for good treatment. However, this may be hard to achieve, even by experienced professionals. AIM: To educate professionals how to detect and diagnose intellectual impairment accompanied by an approximate knowledge on methods and pitfalls in establishing psychiatric diagnoses. METHOD: Several valid instruments for the screening of intellectual impairment in the Netherlands are described in conjunction with adjoining steps in the diagnostic process. RESULTS: To determine mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning by screening and testing intelligence and adaptive functioning, and by establishing an integrative diagnosis by including emotional as well as social level of functioning. Some pitfalls in the diagnostic process are discussed. CONCLUSION: Clinicians must be aware which tools to use to determine broad functioning of the patient and which further steps are necessary for a good diagnosis.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Recognition of intellectual abilities of a patient is essential for good treatment. However, this may be hard to achieve, even by experienced professionals. AIM: To educate professionals how to detect and diagnose intellectual impairment accompanied by an approximate knowledge on methods and pitfalls in establishing psychiatric diagnoses. METHOD: Several valid instruments for the screening of intellectual impairment in the Netherlands are described in conjunction with adjoining steps in the diagnostic process. RESULTS: To determine mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning by screening and testing intelligence and adaptive functioning, and by establishing an integrative diagnosis by including emotional as well as social level of functioning. Some pitfalls in the diagnostic process are discussed. CONCLUSION: Clinicians must be aware which tools to use to determine broad functioning of the patient and which further steps are necessary for a good diagnosis.

Key concepts: Borderline intellectual functioning, Intellectual disability, Medical diagnosis, Adaptive functioning, Psychology, Social functioning, Psychiatry, Mental health

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Recognition and diagnosis in the intellectually impaired in mental health care]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens