1996Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

Ion channels in human axons

Gordon Reid

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Some puzzling differences between rat and human myelinated nerve fibres emerged from work in this department some years ago. Rat nerve was being used to investigate the origin of the spontaneous activity which seems to underlie paraesthesiae, a common and disturbing symptom in neuropathies. It proved to be surprisingly difficult to induce rat nerve to become spontaneously active, although this is easily done in human nerve by manoeuvres such as ischaemia. A related finding is that rat nerve fibres accommodate more than those of humans to long stimuli. The electrotonic behaviour of nerve fibres differs between the two species in ways which suggest different populations of K + channels (Bostock & Baker, 1988). To try to understand these differences, single-channel and multi-channel patch clamping were applied to human axons, followed by voltage clamping of the node of Ranvier. Much of this work was done in collaboration with groups in Giessen, Hamburg and Munich. The results show that the ion channels in human axons are very similar to those in rat axons, as are the action potential and membrane currents in the node. The species differences are still not understood, but may result from differences in ion channel distribution or density, probably in the paranode or internode rather than the node. This chapter will summarize the information about ion channels in human peripheral myelinated axons which arose from this work, and relate this to descriptions of channels in other species.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Some puzzling differences between rat and human myelinated nerve fibres emerged from work in this department some years ago. Rat nerve was being used to investigate the origin of the spontaneous activity which seems to underlie paraesthesiae, a common and disturbing symptom in neuropathies. It proved to be surprisingly difficult to induce rat nerve to become spontaneously active, although this is easily done in human nerve by manoeuvres such as ischaemia. A related finding is that rat nerve fibres accommodate more than those of humans to long stimuli. The electrotonic behaviour of nerve fibres differs between the two species in ways which suggest different populations of K + channels (Bostock & Baker, 1988). To try to understand these differences, single-channel and multi-channel patch clamping were applied to human axons, followed by voltage clamping of the node of Ranvier. Much of this work was done in collaboration with groups in Giessen, Hamburg and Munich. The results show that the ion channels in human axons are very similar to those in rat axons, as are the action potential and membrane currents in the node. The species differences are still not understood, but may result from differences in ion channel distribution or density, probably in the paranode or internode rather than the node. This chapter will summarize the information about ion channels in human peripheral myelinated axons which arose from this work, and relate this to descriptions of channels in other species.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Some puzzling differences between rat and human myelinated nerve fibres emerged from work in this department some years ago. Rat nerve was being used to investigate the origin of the spontaneous activity which seems to underlie paraesthesiae, a common and disturbing symptom in neuropathies. It proved to be surprisingly difficult to induce rat nerve to become spontaneously active, although this is easily done in human nerve by manoeuvres such as ischaemia. A related finding is that rat nerve fibres accommodate more than those of humans to long stimuli. The electrotonic behaviour of nerve fibres differs between the two species in ways which suggest different populations of K + channels (Bostock & Baker, 1988). To try to understand these differences, single-channel and multi-channel patch clamping were applied to human axons, followed by voltage clamping of the node of Ranvier. Much of this work was done in collaboration with groups in Giessen, Hamburg and Munich. The results show that the ion channels in human axons are very similar to those in rat axons, as are the action potential and membrane currents in the node. The species differences are still not understood, but may result from differences in ion channel distribution or density, probably in the paranode or internode rather than the node. This chapter will summarize the information about ion channels in human peripheral myelinated axons which arose from this work, and relate this to descriptions of channels in other species.

Key concepts: Neuroscience, Nerve fibre, Ion channel, Nerve cells, Anatomy, Chemistry, Biology, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Ion channels in human axons — Research Paper | ScholarLens