2014International journal of engineering educationRequires access

The relationship between team gender diversity, idea variety, and potential for design innovation

Nicholas D. Fila, Şenay Purzer

Open publisher page 18 citations

Abstract

Design teams are commonly formed in engineering courses with the expectation that gender diversity will lead to more innovativesolutions, but few studies have examined this relationship. In this study, we investigated whether the variety of ideas and theinnovative qualities of team design solutions are related to team gender diversity. The research participants were 148 engineeringstudents working in 37 teams. These teams were identified as gender balanced or all-male based on their gender composition. Theiridea generation outcomes and final design solutions were evaluated using an established variety metric and a new innovationpotential metric developed by the authors. The innovative potential, variety scores, and correlation between variety and innovationpotential were compared with respect to team gender diversity. The results indicated that gender balanced teams were no moreinnovative than all-male teams, nor were there any significant differences in the variety of alternative solutions between the twogroups. Gender balanced teams, however, did demonstrate a strong positive correlation between variety and innovation potential.Results suggest that diversity, defined by gender alone, may not increase the innovation potential of student design teams but maysupport innovation in the presence of other factors. Efforts should focus on helping teams better utilize their diversity to improvetheir ability to be innovative.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Design teams are commonly formed in engineering courses with the expectation that gender diversity will lead to more innovativesolutions, but few studies have examined this relationship. In this study, we investigated whether the variety of ideas and theinnovative qualities of team design solutions are related to team gender diversity. The research participants were 148 engineeringstudents working in 37 teams. These teams were identified as gender balanced or all-male based on their gender composition. Theiridea generation outcomes and final design solutions were evaluated using an established variety metric and a new innovationpotential metric developed by the authors. The innovative potential, variety scores, and correlation between variety and innovationpotential were compared with respect to team gender diversity. The results indicated that gender balanced teams were no moreinnovative than all-male teams, nor were there any significant differences in the variety of alternative solutions between the twogroups. Gender balanced teams, however, did demonstrate a strong positive correlation between variety and innovation potential.Results suggest that diversity, defined by gender alone, may not increase the innovation potential of student design teams but maysupport innovation in the presence of other factors. Efforts should focus on helping teams better utilize their diversity to improvetheir ability to be innovative.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Design teams are commonly formed in engineering courses with the expectation that gender diversity will lead to more innovativesolutions, but few studies have examined this relationship. In this study, we investigated whether the variety of ideas and theinnovative qualities of team design solutions are related to team gender diversity. The research participants were 148 engineeringstudents working in 37 teams. These teams were identified as gender balanced or all-male based on their gender composition. Theiridea generation outcomes and final design solutions were evaluated using an established variety metric and a new innovationpotential metric developed by the authors. The innovative potential, variety scores, and correlation between variety and innovationpotential were compared with respect to team gender diversity. The results indicated that gender balanced teams were no moreinnovative than all-male teams, nor were there any significant differences in the variety of alternative solutions between the twogroups. Gender balanced teams, however, did demonstrate a strong positive correlation between variety and innovation potential.Results suggest that diversity, defined by gender alone, may not increase the innovation potential of student design teams but maysupport innovation in the presence of other factors. Efforts should focus on helping teams better utilize their diversity to improvetheir ability to be innovative.

Key concepts: Variety (cybernetics), Diversity (politics), Gender diversity, Metric (unit), Psychology, Team composition, Knowledge management, Social psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The relationship between team gender diversity, idea variety, and potential for design innovation — Research Paper | ScholarLens