2018•PubMedRequires access

[Biomechanical stability study on different internal fixation for acetabular fracture].

Yi-Long Dong, Yue-Nan Qian, Liang-le Liu, Xiang-Xiang Huang, Lin-Zhi Lin, Chun-Yuan Cai

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the biomechanical stability of the acetabular fracture with three different internal fixation methods. METHODS: Sixteen both-column acetabular fracture models were randomly divided into three groups:The specimens of 16 hip joints were randomly divided into 4 groups. Among them, 1 group of complete acetabulum were used as normal control group, and the other 3 groups simulated two column fracture models and were fixed in the following methods, respectively: anterior wall with screw and posterior with plate(SP), anterior wall with plate and posterior wall with screw(PS) and both wall with plate (PP). The degree of fracture displacement and the contact characteristics of the acetabulum were recorded by continuous vertical loading. RESULTS: 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Anterior column screw combined with posterior column plate has better biomechanical stability and contact characteristics than other two methods.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the biomechanical stability of the acetabular fracture with three different internal fixation methods. METHODS: Sixteen both-column acetabular fracture models were randomly divided into three groups:The specimens of 16 hip joints were randomly divided into 4 groups. Among them, 1 group of complete acetabulum were used as normal control group, and the other 3 groups simulated two column fracture models and were fixed in the following methods, respectively: anterior wall with screw and posterior with plate(SP), anterior wall with plate and posterior wall with screw(PS) and both wall with plate (PP). The degree of fracture displacement and the contact characteristics of the acetabulum were recorded by continuous vertical loading. RESULTS: 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Anterior column screw combined with posterior column plate has better biomechanical stability and contact characteristics than other two methods.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the biomechanical stability of the acetabular fracture with three different internal fixation methods. METHODS: Sixteen both-column acetabular fracture models were randomly divided into three groups:The specimens of 16 hip joints were randomly divided into 4 groups. Among them, 1 group of complete acetabulum were used as normal control group, and the other 3 groups simulated two column fracture models and were fixed in the following methods, respectively: anterior wall with screw and posterior with plate(SP), anterior wall with plate and posterior wall with screw(PS) and both wall with plate (PP). The degree of fracture displacement and the contact characteristics of the acetabulum were recorded by continuous vertical loading. RESULTS: 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Anterior column screw combined with posterior column plate has better biomechanical stability and contact characteristics than other two methods.

Key concepts: Acetabulum, Medicine, Acetabular fracture, Internal fixation, Displacement (psychology), Significant difference, Posterior column, Fixation (population genetics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Biomechanical stability study on different internal fixation for acetabular fracture]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens