[Biomechanical stability study on different internal fixation for acetabular fracture].
Yi-Long Dong, Yue-Nan Qian, Liang-le Liu, Xiang-Xiang Huang, Lin-Zhi Lin, Chun-Yuan Cai
Abstract
Yi-Long Dong, Yue-Nan Qian, Liang-le Liu, Xiang-Xiang Huang, Lin-Zhi Lin, Chun-Yuan Cai
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the biomechanical stability of the acetabular fracture with three different internal fixation methods. METHODS: Sixteen both-column acetabular fracture models were randomly divided into three groups:The specimens of 16 hip joints were randomly divided into 4 groups. Among them, 1 group of complete acetabulum were used as normal control group, and the other 3 groups simulated two column fracture models and were fixed in the following methods, respectively: anterior wall with screw and posterior with plate(SP), anterior wall with plate and posterior wall with screw(PS) and both wall with plate (PP). The degree of fracture displacement and the contact characteristics of the acetabulum were recorded by continuous vertical loading. RESULTS: 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Anterior column screw combined with posterior column plate has better biomechanical stability and contact characteristics than other two methods.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the biomechanical stability of the acetabular fracture with three different internal fixation methods. METHODS: Sixteen both-column acetabular fracture models were randomly divided into three groups:The specimens of 16 hip joints were randomly divided into 4 groups. Among them, 1 group of complete acetabulum were used as normal control group, and the other 3 groups simulated two column fracture models and were fixed in the following methods, respectively: anterior wall with screw and posterior with plate(SP), anterior wall with plate and posterior wall with screw(PS) and both wall with plate (PP). The degree of fracture displacement and the contact characteristics of the acetabulum were recorded by continuous vertical loading. RESULTS: 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Anterior column screw combined with posterior column plate has better biomechanical stability and contact characteristics than other two methods.
Key concepts: Acetabulum, Medicine, Acetabular fracture, Internal fixation, Displacement (psychology), Significant difference, Posterior column, Fixation (population genetics)