2006UCL Discovery (University College London)Requires access

WHO IS THE IDEAL CANDIDATE FOR AUTOLOGOUS CHONDROCYTE IMPLANTATION

Shibu P. Krishnan, John Skinner, Richard Carrington, G. Bentley

Open publisher page 22 citations

Abstract

Introduction and aim: Several authors have suggested that hyaline repair tissue following autologous – chondrocyte implantation (ACI) gives better clinical results than either mixed hyaline and fibrocartilage or fibrocartilage alone. This data is based on the use of periosteum as a covering membrane in these previous studies. We have for some years been using a porcine collagen type 1/III membrane (ACI-C) instead of periosteum and have now the opportunity to analyze the clinical results when compared with the histology of the repaired defect. We have also analysed the influence on the result of age and sex of the patient, the etiology of the lesion, the duration of the knee symptoms, number of previous knee procedures, the site and size of defect and the preoperative functional scores. Method: Until 2004, 234 patients underwent autologous chondrocyte implantation at our centre. The patients were assessed clinically by their modified Cincinnati scores prospectively from 1 to 4 years from surgery. Also at arthroscopy (1 to 3 years following ACI-C) they underwent biopsy of the implant where possible and the neo-cartilage was graded as hyaline (H), mixed fibrohyaline (F.H), fibrocartilagenous (F.C) and fibrous (F). Results: The clinical results showed that older patients had poorer results (p

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction and aim: Several authors have suggested that hyaline repair tissue following autologous – chondrocyte implantation (ACI) gives better clinical results than either mixed hyaline and fibrocartilage or fibrocartilage alone. This data is based on the use of periosteum as a covering membrane in these previous studies. We have for some years been using a porcine collagen type 1/III membrane (ACI-C) instead of periosteum and have now the opportunity to analyze the clinical results when compared with the histology of the repaired defect. We have also analysed the influence on the result of age and sex of the patient, the etiology of the lesion, the duration of the knee symptoms, number of previous knee procedures, the site and size of defect and the preoperative functional scores. Method: Until 2004, 234 patients underwent autologous chondrocyte implantation at our centre. The patients were assessed clinically by their modified Cincinnati scores prospectively from 1 to 4 years from surgery. Also at arthroscopy (1 to 3 years following ACI-C) they underwent biopsy of the implant where possible and the neo-cartilage was graded as hyaline (H), mixed fibrohyaline (F.H), fibrocartilagenous (F.C) and fibrous (F). Results: The clinical results showed that older patients had poorer results (p

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 22 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction and aim: Several authors have suggested that hyaline repair tissue following autologous – chondrocyte implantation (ACI) gives better clinical results than either mixed hyaline and fibrocartilage or fibrocartilage alone. This data is based on the use of periosteum as a covering membrane in these previous studies. We have for some years been using a porcine collagen type 1/III membrane (ACI-C) instead of periosteum and have now the opportunity to analyze the clinical results when compared with the histology of the repaired defect. We have also analysed the influence on the result of age and sex of the patient, the etiology of the lesion, the duration of the knee symptoms, number of previous knee procedures, the site and size of defect and the preoperative functional scores. Method: Until 2004, 234 patients underwent autologous chondrocyte implantation at our centre. The patients were assessed clinically by their modified Cincinnati scores prospectively from 1 to 4 years from surgery. Also at arthroscopy (1 to 3 years following ACI-C) they underwent biopsy of the implant where possible and the neo-cartilage was graded as hyaline (H), mixed fibrohyaline (F.H), fibrocartilagenous (F.C) and fibrous (F). Results: The clinical results showed that older patients had poorer results (p

Key concepts: Autologous chondrocyte implantation, Fibrocartilage, Medicine, Periosteum, Hyaline cartilage, Surgery, Hyaline, Arthroscopy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
WHO IS THE IDEAL CANDIDATE FOR AUTOLOGOUS CHONDROCYTE IMPLANTATION — Research Paper | ScholarLens