2018PubMedRequires access

Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in pancreatic lesions.

Q-M Wu, Y-N Guo, Y-Q Xu

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in pancreatic lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with pancreatic lesions after CT (or MRI) and EUS-FNA examination were retrospectively enrolled. Cytopathological diagnosis of pancreas tissue were obtained by surgery or EUS-FNA. Clinical follow-up results were used as golden standard for diagnosis of pancreatic lesions. Statistical analysis was performed by Student's t-test for continuous data and Fischer exact test for categorical data. RESULTS: A total of 18 patients with pancreatic lesions were included in this study, 7 of which were diagnosed as benign lesions and 11 were diagnosed as malignant lesions. Endoscopic ultrasonography (ESU) showed that most of the lesions were in pancreatic body (42.9%), followed by pancreatic head, pancreatic tail, and pancreatic neck. The maximum diameter of malignant lesions was larger compared with that of benign and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of EUS-FNA for differentiating diagnosis of malignant and benign pancreatic lesions was 83.3%, 80%, 83.3%, 90.9%, and 71.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-FNA cytological diagnosis is safe and effective for differentiating diagnosis of malignant and benign pancreatic lesions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: This aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in pancreatic lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with pancreatic lesions after CT (or MRI) and EUS-FNA examination were retrospectively enrolled. Cytopathological diagnosis of pancreas tissue were obtained by surgery or EUS-FNA. Clinical follow-up results were used as golden standard for diagnosis of pancreatic lesions. Statistical analysis was performed by Student's t-test for continuous data and Fischer exact test for categorical data. RESULTS: A total of 18 patients with pancreatic lesions were included in this study, 7 of which were diagnosed as benign lesions and 11 were diagnosed as malignant lesions. Endoscopic ultrasonography (ESU) showed that most of the lesions were in pancreatic body (42.9%), followed by pancreatic head, pancreatic tail, and pancreatic neck. The maximum diameter of malignant lesions was larger compared with that of benign and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of EUS-FNA for differentiating diagnosis of malignant and benign pancreatic lesions was 83.3%, 80%, 83.3%, 90.9%, and 71.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-FNA cytological diagnosis is safe and effective for differentiating diagnosis of malignant and benign pancreatic lesions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: This aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in pancreatic lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with pancreatic lesions after CT (or MRI) and EUS-FNA examination were retrospectively enrolled. Cytopathological diagnosis of pancreas tissue were obtained by surgery or EUS-FNA. Clinical follow-up results were used as golden standard for diagnosis of pancreatic lesions. Statistical analysis was performed by Student's t-test for continuous data and Fischer exact test for categorical data. RESULTS: A total of 18 patients with pancreatic lesions were included in this study, 7 of which were diagnosed as benign lesions and 11 were diagnosed as malignant lesions. Endoscopic ultrasonography (ESU) showed that most of the lesions were in pancreatic body (42.9%), followed by pancreatic head, pancreatic tail, and pancreatic neck. The maximum diameter of malignant lesions was larger compared with that of benign and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of EUS-FNA for differentiating diagnosis of malignant and benign pancreatic lesions was 83.3%, 80%, 83.3%, 90.9%, and 71.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-FNA cytological diagnosis is safe and effective for differentiating diagnosis of malignant and benign pancreatic lesions.

Key concepts: Medicine, Fine-needle aspiration, Radiology, Pancreas, Endoscopic ultrasound, Diagnostic accuracy, Pancreatic mass, Pancreatic disease

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in pancreatic lesions. — Research Paper | ScholarLens