2006National Bureau of Economic ResearchOpen access

Does How Much and How You Pay Matter? Evidence from the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Prospective Payment System

Neeraj Sood, Melinda Buntin, José J. Escarce

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

We use the implementation of a new prospective payment system (PPS) for inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) to investigate the effect of changes in marginal and average reimbursement on costs.The results show that the IRF PPS led to a significant decline in costs and length of stay.Changes in marginal reimbursement associated with the move from a cost based system to a PPS led to a 7 to 11% reduction in costs.The elasticity of costs with respect average reimbursement ranged from 0.26 to 0.34.Finally, the IRF PPS had little or no impact on costs in other sites of care, mortality, or the rate of return to community residence.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We use the implementation of a new prospective payment system (PPS) for inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) to investigate the effect of changes in marginal and average reimbursement on costs.The results show that the IRF PPS led to a significant decline in costs and length of stay.Changes in marginal reimbursement associated with the move from a cost based system to a PPS led to a 7 to 11% reduction in costs.The elasticity of costs with respect average reimbursement ranged from 0.26 to 0.34.Finally, the IRF PPS had little or no impact on costs in other sites of care, mortality, or the rate of return to community residence.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We use the implementation of a new prospective payment system (PPS) for inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) to investigate the effect of changes in marginal and average reimbursement on costs.The results show that the IRF PPS led to a significant decline in costs and length of stay.Changes in marginal reimbursement associated with the move from a cost based system to a PPS led to a 7 to 11% reduction in costs.The elasticity of costs with respect average reimbursement ranged from 0.26 to 0.34.Finally, the IRF PPS had little or no impact on costs in other sites of care, mortality, or the rate of return to community residence.

Key concepts: Prospective payment system, Reimbursement, Payment, Residence, Marginal cost, Business, Actuarial science, Payment system

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Does How Much and How You Pay Matter? Evidence from the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Prospective Payment System — Research Paper | ScholarLens