2016PubMedRequires access

[Consistency between the electronic and mercury sphygmomanometer in children and adolescents on blood pressure measuring].

Qiuye Cao, Donghua Li, Wentao Yu, Qiya Guo, Liyun Zhao, Dongmei Yu, Yuhe Wang

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the consistency between the electronic sphygmomanometer and mercury sphygmomanometer on blood pressure measuring in children and adolescents. METHODS: 201 children and adolescents were from 6neighborhood of Hunan Province. Dr Mike BPA100 Plus electronic sphygmomanometer was used for three times to test the difference. The blood pressure value of mercury sphygmomanometer was gold standard. The difference of systolic pressure and diastolic pressure of two devices was tested using paired t test, Bland-Altman analysis, and interclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Paired t test showed the statistical difference on the systolic pressure( t = 24. 71, 0. 0001) and diastolic pressure( t = 23. 81, < 0. 0001) of two devices. Both the systolic pressure and diastolic pressure of electronic sphygmomanometer was higher than that of mercury sphygmomanometer. Bland-Altman analysis showed mercury sphygmomanometer couldn 't be simply replaced by electronic sphygmomanometer. The result of interclass correlation coefficient presented a poor consistency between two devices. CONCLUSION: In order to get scientific conclusion, the comparable study between two blood pressure measuring devices should be conductedbefore a large-scale survey on child and adolescent.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To study the consistency between the electronic sphygmomanometer and mercury sphygmomanometer on blood pressure measuring in children and adolescents. METHODS: 201 children and adolescents were from 6neighborhood of Hunan Province. Dr Mike BPA100 Plus electronic sphygmomanometer was used for three times to test the difference. The blood pressure value of mercury sphygmomanometer was gold standard. The difference of systolic pressure and diastolic pressure of two devices was tested using paired t test, Bland-Altman analysis, and interclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Paired t test showed the statistical difference on the systolic pressure( t = 24. 71, 0. 0001) and diastolic pressure( t = 23. 81, < 0. 0001) of two devices. Both the systolic pressure and diastolic pressure of electronic sphygmomanometer was higher than that of mercury sphygmomanometer. Bland-Altman analysis showed mercury sphygmomanometer couldn 't be simply replaced by electronic sphygmomanometer. The result of interclass correlation coefficient presented a poor consistency between two devices. CONCLUSION: In order to get scientific conclusion, the comparable study between two blood pressure measuring devices should be conductedbefore a large-scale survey on child and adolescent.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the consistency between the electronic sphygmomanometer and mercury sphygmomanometer on blood pressure measuring in children and adolescents. METHODS: 201 children and adolescents were from 6neighborhood of Hunan Province. Dr Mike BPA100 Plus electronic sphygmomanometer was used for three times to test the difference. The blood pressure value of mercury sphygmomanometer was gold standard. The difference of systolic pressure and diastolic pressure of two devices was tested using paired t test, Bland-Altman analysis, and interclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Paired t test showed the statistical difference on the systolic pressure( t = 24. 71, 0. 0001) and diastolic pressure( t = 23. 81, < 0. 0001) of two devices. Both the systolic pressure and diastolic pressure of electronic sphygmomanometer was higher than that of mercury sphygmomanometer. Bland-Altman analysis showed mercury sphygmomanometer couldn 't be simply replaced by electronic sphygmomanometer. The result of interclass correlation coefficient presented a poor consistency between two devices. CONCLUSION: In order to get scientific conclusion, the comparable study between two blood pressure measuring devices should be conductedbefore a large-scale survey on child and adolescent.

Key concepts: Blood pressure, Sphygmomanometer, Medicine, Significant difference, Diastole, Internal medicine, Cardiology, Physical therapy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Consistency between the electronic and mercury sphygmomanometer in children and adolescents on blood pressure measuring]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens