2017PubMedRequires access

Preemption of Non-Federal Restraints on Off-Label Product Communications.

Jeffrey Chasnow, Geoffrey M. Levitt

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Evolving First Amendment principles are forcing FDA and other federal regulators of medical products to rethink traditional regulatory approaches to off-label product communications. State regulators, which have actively sought injunctions restricting manufacturer communications to the four-corners of the FDA-approved product label, must additionally abide by federal preemption principles. This article reviews the application of preemption principles to off-label communications and concludes that most, if not all, state-law restraints on off-label communications are preempted by federal law. This finding has important implications for state enforcement initiatives, and puts into question the validity of some elements of existing state-law injunctions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Evolving First Amendment principles are forcing FDA and other federal regulators of medical products to rethink traditional regulatory approaches to off-label product communications. State regulators, which have actively sought injunctions restricting manufacturer communications to the four-corners of the FDA-approved product label, must additionally abide by federal preemption principles. This article reviews the application of preemption principles to off-label communications and concludes that most, if not all, state-law restraints on off-label communications are preempted by federal law. This finding has important implications for state enforcement initiatives, and puts into question the validity of some elements of existing state-law injunctions.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Evolving First Amendment principles are forcing FDA and other federal regulators of medical products to rethink traditional regulatory approaches to off-label product communications. State regulators, which have actively sought injunctions restricting manufacturer communications to the four-corners of the FDA-approved product label, must additionally abide by federal preemption principles. This article reviews the application of preemption principles to off-label communications and concludes that most, if not all, state-law restraints on off-label communications are preempted by federal law. This finding has important implications for state enforcement initiatives, and puts into question the validity of some elements of existing state-law injunctions.

Key concepts: Preemption, Federal preemption, Enforcement, Product (mathematics), Federal law, State (computer science), Business, Law enforcement

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Preemption of Non-Federal Restraints on Off-Label Product Communications. — Research Paper | ScholarLens