2015•The Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogyOpen access

Numerical investigation of the fluidic injection angle effects on thrust vectoring

Farzad Forghany, A. Asdollahi-Ghohieh, M. Taiebi-Rahni

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

A computational investigation of the fluidic injection angle effects on fluidic thrust vectoring was conducted. Simulation of a two-dimensional convergent-divergent (2DCD) nozzle withshock-vector control method of fluidic injection for pitch vector control was performed with the computational fluid dynamics, using Spalart-Allmaras (S-A) one equation turbulence model. Nozzle design included fluidic variables and injection angle. The secondary flow was injected through a slot in the upper divergent wall. A nozzle pressure ratio (NPR) of 4.6.was assumed. Variable secondary pressure ratios (SPR) from 0.7 to 1.6 were investigated at Mw=0.05; which correspondeds to secondary mass flow rates of 4% to 10% of the primary mass flow rate. The effect of variable fluidic injection angle from 60° to 120° on pitch thrust vector angle and thrust vectoring efficiency were investigated. Computational results indicates that increasing SPR in all cases, increased pitch thrust vector angle and decreased thrust vectoring efficiency; also the greatest pitch thrust vector angle was achieved in the smaller fluidic injection angle.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A computational investigation of the fluidic injection angle effects on fluidic thrust vectoring was conducted. Simulation of a two-dimensional convergent-divergent (2DCD) nozzle withshock-vector control method of fluidic injection for pitch vector control was performed with the computational fluid dynamics, using Spalart-Allmaras (S-A) one equation turbulence model. Nozzle design included fluidic variables and injection angle. The secondary flow was injected through a slot in the upper divergent wall. A nozzle pressure ratio (NPR) of 4.6.was assumed. Variable secondary pressure ratios (SPR) from 0.7 to 1.6 were investigated at Mw=0.05; which correspondeds to secondary mass flow rates of 4% to 10% of the primary mass flow rate. The effect of variable fluidic injection angle from 60° to 120° on pitch thrust vector angle and thrust vectoring efficiency were investigated. Computational results indicates that increasing SPR in all cases, increased pitch thrust vector angle and decreased thrust vectoring efficiency; also the greatest pitch thrust vector angle was achieved in the smaller fluidic injection angle.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A computational investigation of the fluidic injection angle effects on fluidic thrust vectoring was conducted. Simulation of a two-dimensional convergent-divergent (2DCD) nozzle withshock-vector control method of fluidic injection for pitch vector control was performed with the computational fluid dynamics, using Spalart-Allmaras (S-A) one equation turbulence model. Nozzle design included fluidic variables and injection angle. The secondary flow was injected through a slot in the upper divergent wall. A nozzle pressure ratio (NPR) of 4.6.was assumed. Variable secondary pressure ratios (SPR) from 0.7 to 1.6 were investigated at Mw=0.05; which correspondeds to secondary mass flow rates of 4% to 10% of the primary mass flow rate. The effect of variable fluidic injection angle from 60° to 120° on pitch thrust vector angle and thrust vectoring efficiency were investigated. Computational results indicates that increasing SPR in all cases, increased pitch thrust vector angle and decreased thrust vectoring efficiency; also the greatest pitch thrust vector angle was achieved in the smaller fluidic injection angle.

Key concepts: Thrust vectoring, Nozzle, Fluidics, Thrust, Mechanics, Materials science, Mass flow rate, Turbulence

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Numerical investigation of the fluidic injection angle effects on thrust vectoring — Research Paper | ScholarLens