2020International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and GynaecologyOpen access

A comparitive study between unfavourable cervix and favorable cervix for incidence of caesarean section with the induction of labour

M Rishitha, C. R. Anuradha, J Vasantha Lakshmi

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Aims: To determine the incidence of cesarean delivery with the induction of labor in patients with unfavourable cervix and favourable cervix. To compare the efficacy and effects of induction methods on mode of delivery.Methodology: This is a prospective comparative study of 200 nulliparous women classified as groups. 1: Induction group with unfavorable cervix (Bishop score <5) A: Intracervical PGE2 gel, B: Foley catheter, C: tablet misoprostol. 2: Induction group with favorable cervix (Bishop score >5)-Amniotomy + oxytocin. Results: Cesarean delivery rate was 31.3% among patients with unfavourable cervix and 16% with favorable cervix. Comparing Foley, PGE2 gel, misoprostol change in Bishop score was almost similar between Foley and misoprostol and more than PGE2.Conclusion: Induction of labor in a term nulliparous patient resulted in significantly higher cesarean section rate with unfavourable cervix. Foley catheter for pre-induction cervical ripening have greater change in Bishop score.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Aims: To determine the incidence of cesarean delivery with the induction of labor in patients with unfavourable cervix and favourable cervix. To compare the efficacy and effects of induction methods on mode of delivery.Methodology: This is a prospective comparative study of 200 nulliparous women classified as groups. 1: Induction group with unfavorable cervix (Bishop score <5) A: Intracervical PGE2 gel, B: Foley catheter, C: tablet misoprostol. 2: Induction group with favorable cervix (Bishop score >5)-Amniotomy + oxytocin. Results: Cesarean delivery rate was 31.3% among patients with unfavourable cervix and 16% with favorable cervix. Comparing Foley, PGE2 gel, misoprostol change in Bishop score was almost similar between Foley and misoprostol and more than PGE2.Conclusion: Induction of labor in a term nulliparous patient resulted in significantly higher cesarean section rate with unfavourable cervix. Foley catheter for pre-induction cervical ripening have greater change in Bishop score.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Aims: To determine the incidence of cesarean delivery with the induction of labor in patients with unfavourable cervix and favourable cervix. To compare the efficacy and effects of induction methods on mode of delivery.Methodology: This is a prospective comparative study of 200 nulliparous women classified as groups. 1: Induction group with unfavorable cervix (Bishop score <5) A: Intracervical PGE2 gel, B: Foley catheter, C: tablet misoprostol. 2: Induction group with favorable cervix (Bishop score >5)-Amniotomy + oxytocin. Results: Cesarean delivery rate was 31.3% among patients with unfavourable cervix and 16% with favorable cervix. Comparing Foley, PGE2 gel, misoprostol change in Bishop score was almost similar between Foley and misoprostol and more than PGE2.Conclusion: Induction of labor in a term nulliparous patient resulted in significantly higher cesarean section rate with unfavourable cervix. Foley catheter for pre-induction cervical ripening have greater change in Bishop score.

Key concepts: Misoprostol, Cervix, Foley catheter, Medicine, Bishop score, Caesarean section, Labor induction, Foley

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparitive study between unfavourable cervix and favorable cervix for incidence of caesarean section with the induction of labour — Research Paper | ScholarLens