1996QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)Open access

Construction Project Delivery Systems: An Analysis of Selection Criteria Weighting

Peter E.D. Love, Martin Skitmore

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

A postal questionnaire survey is described involving a sample of 41 clients, 34 contractors and 35 consultants and concerning their experiences and attitudes to a variety of project delivery systems and the criteria used for selection. The results indicate that a simple set of the criteria are generally adequate and sufficient for procurement path selection and that there is a reasonable consensus on their appropriate weighting for each path. It is also shown that similar clients generally do not have similar project delivery needs but nevertheless only one delivery method, that of novation, best satisfies the needs of those involved in the study.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A postal questionnaire survey is described involving a sample of 41 clients, 34 contractors and 35 consultants and concerning their experiences and attitudes to a variety of project delivery systems and the criteria used for selection. The results indicate that a simple set of the criteria are generally adequate and sufficient for procurement path selection and that there is a reasonable consensus on their appropriate weighting for each path. It is also shown that similar clients generally do not have similar project delivery needs but nevertheless only one delivery method, that of novation, best satisfies the needs of those involved in the study.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A postal questionnaire survey is described involving a sample of 41 clients, 34 contractors and 35 consultants and concerning their experiences and attitudes to a variety of project delivery systems and the criteria used for selection. The results indicate that a simple set of the criteria are generally adequate and sufficient for procurement path selection and that there is a reasonable consensus on their appropriate weighting for each path. It is also shown that similar clients generally do not have similar project delivery needs but nevertheless only one delivery method, that of novation, best satisfies the needs of those involved in the study.

Key concepts: Weighting, Selection (genetic algorithm), Procurement, Path (computing), Set (abstract data type), Operations research, Variety (cybernetics), Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Construction Project Delivery Systems: An Analysis of Selection Criteria Weighting — Research Paper | ScholarLens