20192019 IEEE 3rd International Electrical and Energy Conference (CIEEC)Requires access

Comparison of Performances between Angle Droop Control and Frequency Droop Control in Microgrids

Weiqiang Yao, Wei Bao, Yin Xu, Sijia Wang, Xiangyu Wu, Shanshan Shi

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Compared with frequency droop control, angle droop control avoids frequency deviation, but it is hard to share active power exactly among distributed generations (DGs). Although this defect can be solved by secondary control, frequency droop control also has a similar way to eliminate frequency deviation. In this paper, several typical operating conditions are designed to test the control effects of these two control methods, and the following conclusions are drawn: using angle droop control is able to make the frequency more stable and take shorter time to enter the steady state than frequency droop control. Finally, the conclusion is validated by analyzing the simulation results.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Compared with frequency droop control, angle droop control avoids frequency deviation, but it is hard to share active power exactly among distributed generations (DGs). Although this defect can be solved by secondary control, frequency droop control also has a similar way to eliminate frequency deviation. In this paper, several typical operating conditions are designed to test the control effects of these two control methods, and the following conclusions are drawn: using angle droop control is able to make the frequency more stable and take shorter time to enter the steady state than frequency droop control. Finally, the conclusion is validated by analyzing the simulation results.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Compared with frequency droop control, angle droop control avoids frequency deviation, but it is hard to share active power exactly among distributed generations (DGs). Although this defect can be solved by secondary control, frequency droop control also has a similar way to eliminate frequency deviation. In this paper, several typical operating conditions are designed to test the control effects of these two control methods, and the following conclusions are drawn: using angle droop control is able to make the frequency more stable and take shorter time to enter the steady state than frequency droop control. Finally, the conclusion is validated by analyzing the simulation results.

Key concepts: Voltage droop, Control theory (sociology), Automatic frequency control, Frequency deviation, Control (management), Power (physics), Computer science, Physics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Performances between Angle Droop Control and Frequency Droop Control in Microgrids — Research Paper | ScholarLens