2020•Deep Blue (University of Michigan)Open access

Urban National Parks: The Evolution of National Parks and Equitable Conservation into the Urban Landscape

John Pritchard

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Urban National Parks are uniquely situated not only to provide ecological refuge within the human-dominated built environment, but also to provide a space to reconcile our collective relationship with nature. If these spaces are not protected in equitable ways, with fair access and opportunity grounded in community placemaking, they might merely represent another form of NIMBYism (not in my back yard). In the context of dynamic changes and unprecedented threats to the stability of the natural world, we should look to Urban National Parks as spaces for reconciliation between utilitarian needs and the conservation of nature. What guidelines might urban planners, landscape architects, and ecological designers use to ensure this process is conducted in an equitable way? This paper seeks to put forth a framework for understanding and addressing these problems in the face of climatic and sociopolitical change.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Urban National Parks are uniquely situated not only to provide ecological refuge within the human-dominated built environment, but also to provide a space to reconcile our collective relationship with nature. If these spaces are not protected in equitable ways, with fair access and opportunity grounded in community placemaking, they might merely represent another form of NIMBYism (not in my back yard). In the context of dynamic changes and unprecedented threats to the stability of the natural world, we should look to Urban National Parks as spaces for reconciliation between utilitarian needs and the conservation of nature. What guidelines might urban planners, landscape architects, and ecological designers use to ensure this process is conducted in an equitable way? This paper seeks to put forth a framework for understanding and addressing these problems in the face of climatic and sociopolitical change.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Urban National Parks are uniquely situated not only to provide ecological refuge within the human-dominated built environment, but also to provide a space to reconcile our collective relationship with nature. If these spaces are not protected in equitable ways, with fair access and opportunity grounded in community placemaking, they might merely represent another form of NIMBYism (not in my back yard). In the context of dynamic changes and unprecedented threats to the stability of the natural world, we should look to Urban National Parks as spaces for reconciliation between utilitarian needs and the conservation of nature. What guidelines might urban planners, landscape architects, and ecological designers use to ensure this process is conducted in an equitable way? This paper seeks to put forth a framework for understanding and addressing these problems in the face of climatic and sociopolitical change.

Key concepts: Geography, Environmental planning, Urban landscape, Urban planning, Environmental resource management, Environmental protection, Ecology, Environmental science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Urban National Parks: The Evolution of National Parks and Equitable Conservation into the Urban Landscape — Research Paper | ScholarLens