1997Unpublished venueRequires access

Simulating U.S. Tax Reform, Working Paper 97-12

David Altig, Alan J. Auerbach, Laurence J. Kotlikoff, Kent Smetters, Jan Walliser

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

A presentation of a large-scale, dynamic simulation model for comparing the equity, efficiency, and macroeconomic effects of five alternatives to the current U.S. federal income tax: a proportional income tax, a proportional consumption tax, a flat tax, a flat tax with transition relief, and a progressive variant of the flat tax called the X tax.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A presentation of a large-scale, dynamic simulation model for comparing the equity, efficiency, and macroeconomic effects of five alternatives to the current U.S. federal income tax: a proportional income tax, a proportional consumption tax, a flat tax, a flat tax with transition relief, and a progressive variant of the flat tax called the X tax.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A presentation of a large-scale, dynamic simulation model for comparing the equity, efficiency, and macroeconomic effects of five alternatives to the current U.S. federal income tax: a proportional income tax, a proportional consumption tax, a flat tax, a flat tax with transition relief, and a progressive variant of the flat tax called the X tax.

Key concepts: Tax reform, Flat tax, Economics, Indirect tax, Consumption tax, Value-added tax, State income tax, Ad valorem tax

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Simulating U.S. Tax Reform, Working Paper 97-12 — Research Paper | ScholarLens