Simulating U.S. Tax Reform, Working Paper 97-12
David Altig, Alan J. Auerbach, Laurence J. Kotlikoff, Kent Smetters, Jan Walliser
Abstract
David Altig, Alan J. Auerbach, Laurence J. Kotlikoff, Kent Smetters, Jan Walliser
Abstract
A presentation of a large-scale, dynamic simulation model for comparing the equity, efficiency, and macroeconomic effects of five alternatives to the current U.S. federal income tax: a proportional income tax, a proportional consumption tax, a flat tax, a flat tax with transition relief, and a progressive variant of the flat tax called the X tax.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A presentation of a large-scale, dynamic simulation model for comparing the equity, efficiency, and macroeconomic effects of five alternatives to the current U.S. federal income tax: a proportional income tax, a proportional consumption tax, a flat tax, a flat tax with transition relief, and a progressive variant of the flat tax called the X tax.
Key concepts: Tax reform, Flat tax, Economics, Indirect tax, Consumption tax, Value-added tax, State income tax, Ad valorem tax