1978Unpublished venueOpen access

Energy from urban wastes: report on a Focus Group discussion

Wendell E. Nicholson

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This discussion represents a qualitative assessment of the dimensions of opinion concerning the commercialization potential of urban-waste technologies. It was generally agreed that energy production from urban wastes is technically feasible and, in certain situations, commercially viable, but that is unlikely that the resource will provide more than a small fraction of national energy supply. Barriers to the commercialization of the urban-waste energy-production systems that were discussed include problems in serving long-term contracts, uncertainty about environmntal laws, problems with the supply of refuse, disposal and use of residue, uncertainties about future tax laws, legal barriers, technical reliability, and citizen dissent. The general feeling was that these barriers would be overcome over time as experience with production systems is gained. Potential government policies that received expressions of support include long-term sales commitments, grandfather clauses in new environmental laws, and legal aid to municipalities. However, there was little indication of either the need for or the desirability of large-scale direct government action in this area. In general, participants' views seemed to agree with the criticality assessments made previously by DOE. The only major additional consideration was the potential benefits and conflicts involved in the relationship between recycling and energy use of urban wastes. There was also marked disagreement between participants and DOE about the relative importance of safety regulations. They were not generally aware of any such regulations that would have a major impact on their business.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This discussion represents a qualitative assessment of the dimensions of opinion concerning the commercialization potential of urban-waste technologies. It was generally agreed that energy production from urban wastes is technically feasible and, in certain situations, commercially viable, but that is unlikely that the resource will provide more than a small fraction of national energy supply. Barriers to the commercialization of the urban-waste energy-production systems that were discussed include problems in serving long-term contracts, uncertainty about environmntal laws, problems with the supply of refuse, disposal and use of residue, uncertainties about future tax laws, legal barriers, technical reliability, and citizen dissent. The general feeling was that these barriers would be overcome over time as experience with production systems is gained. Potential government policies that received expressions of support include long-term sales commitments, grandfather clauses in new environmental laws, and legal aid to municipalities. However, there was little indication of either the need for or the desirability of large-scale direct government action in this area. In general, participants' views seemed to agree with the criticality assessments made previously by DOE. The only major additional consideration was the potential benefits and conflicts involved in the relationship between recycling and energy use of urban wastes. There was also marked disagreement between participants and DOE about the relative importance of safety regulations. They were not generally aware of any such regulations that would have a major impact on their business.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This discussion represents a qualitative assessment of the dimensions of opinion concerning the commercialization potential of urban-waste technologies. It was generally agreed that energy production from urban wastes is technically feasible and, in certain situations, commercially viable, but that is unlikely that the resource will provide more than a small fraction of national energy supply. Barriers to the commercialization of the urban-waste energy-production systems that were discussed include problems in serving long-term contracts, uncertainty about environmntal laws, problems with the supply of refuse, disposal and use of residue, uncertainties about future tax laws, legal barriers, technical reliability, and citizen dissent. The general feeling was that these barriers would be overcome over time as experience with production systems is gained. Potential government policies that received expressions of support include long-term sales commitments, grandfather clauses in new environmental laws, and legal aid to municipalities. However, there was little indication of either the need for or the desirability of large-scale direct government action in this area. In general, participants' views seemed to agree with the criticality assessments made previously by DOE. The only major additional consideration was the potential benefits and conflicts involved in the relationship between recycling and energy use of urban wastes. There was also marked disagreement between participants and DOE about the relative importance of safety regulations. They were not generally aware of any such regulations that would have a major impact on their business.

Key concepts: Commercialization, Business, Government (linguistics), Production (economics), Resource (disambiguation), Energy supply, Environmental economics, Environmental planning

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Energy from urban wastes: report on a Focus Group discussion — Research Paper | ScholarLens