19975th International Congress of the Brazilian Geophysical SocietyRequires access

The Neoproterozoic Rodinia, its Break-up and the Formation of Gondwana: Paleomagnetic Evidence.

Manoel S. D’Agrella-Filho, R. Siqueira, Ricardo I.F. Trindade, Cosme F. Ponte-Neto, I. G. Pacca

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Hoffman (1991) elaborated a model proposing the Meso/Neo Proterozoic Rodinia supercontinent (Fig. 1), based on geological and (partly) on paleomagnetic grounds. He suggested that Baltica, Amazonia, Congo and Kalahari were the most probable units to border eastern and southern Laurentia, since they have similar Grenvillian orogenic belts (1.2-1.0 Ga). In his model, Hoffman (1991) suggests that the (present) northeastern Kalahari craton (including the Lurian belt) was flanked by East Antarctica, and that this craton belonged to the East Gondwana during the amalgamation of the Gondwana supercontinent in the Neoproterozoic.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Hoffman (1991) elaborated a model proposing the Meso/Neo Proterozoic Rodinia supercontinent (Fig. 1), based on geological and (partly) on paleomagnetic grounds. He suggested that Baltica, Amazonia, Congo and Kalahari were the most probable units to border eastern and southern Laurentia, since they have similar Grenvillian orogenic belts (1.2-1.0 Ga). In his model, Hoffman (1991) suggests that the (present) northeastern Kalahari craton (including the Lurian belt) was flanked by East Antarctica, and that this craton belonged to the East Gondwana during the amalgamation of the Gondwana supercontinent in the Neoproterozoic.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Hoffman (1991) elaborated a model proposing the Meso/Neo Proterozoic Rodinia supercontinent (Fig. 1), based on geological and (partly) on paleomagnetic grounds. He suggested that Baltica, Amazonia, Congo and Kalahari were the most probable units to border eastern and southern Laurentia, since they have similar Grenvillian orogenic belts (1.2-1.0 Ga). In his model, Hoffman (1991) suggests that the (present) northeastern Kalahari craton (including the Lurian belt) was flanked by East Antarctica, and that this craton belonged to the East Gondwana during the amalgamation of the Gondwana supercontinent in the Neoproterozoic.

Key concepts: Rodinia, Supercontinent, Gondwana, Laurentia, Craton, Paleomagnetism, Geology, Proterozoic

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Neoproterozoic Rodinia, its Break-up and the Formation of Gondwana: Paleomagnetic Evidence. — Research Paper | ScholarLens