On the Optimality of One-size-fits-all Contracts: The Limited Liability Case
Felipe Balmaceda
Abstract
Open-access reader
Felipe Balmaceda
Abstract
Open-access reader
In this paper I study a multi-task principal agent model with a risk-neutral principal and a risk neutral agent subject to limited liability in an environment with adverse selection and moral hazard. The main results are as follows: (1) the optimal contracts in each possible case is a bonus-type contract that pays a bonus only when the highest signal is realized; (2) the informational rent as well as the limited liability rent are not independent; and (3) under moral and adverse selection the bonus contract exhibits a one-size-fits-all property; that is, in equilibrium all agents are offered the same contract. Under this contract more talented agents work harder and have a higher expected payoff and are on average more productive than less talented agents. This provides a rationale for the absence of menu of contracts in many different settings such as sales contracts, debt contracts, farming workers and optimal regulation. JEL-Classification: D82, D86, J33. Key words: Moral Hazard, Adverse Selection, Multiple Tasks, Limited Liability.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In this paper I study a multi-task principal agent model with a risk-neutral principal and a risk neutral agent subject to limited liability in an environment with adverse selection and moral hazard. The main results are as follows: (1) the optimal contracts in each possible case is a bonus-type contract that pays a bonus only when the highest signal is realized; (2) the informational rent as well as the limited liability rent are not independent; and (3) under moral and adverse selection the bonus contract exhibits a one-size-fits-all property; that is, in equilibrium all agents are offered the same contract. Under this contract more talented agents work harder and have a higher expected payoff and are on average more productive than less talented agents. This provides a rationale for the absence of menu of contracts in many different settings such as sales contracts, debt contracts, farming workers and optimal regulation. JEL-Classification: D82, D86, J33. Key words: Moral Hazard, Adverse Selection, Multiple Tasks, Limited Liability.
Key concepts: Moral hazard, Adverse selection, Limited liability, Principal (computer security), Stochastic game, Liability, Microeconomics, Risk neutral