2013•Unpublished venueRequires access

A Place for Religious Atheism in 21st Century Spirituality?

Wim Van Moer

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In revisiting William James’ Varieties of Religious Experience, Charles Taylor points out that, in our post-Durkheimian world, individuals will make what they can of their religious experience. One of the consequences of these fractures, Taylor explains, is a rise in number of people calling themselves atheists, agnostics or non-religious. Furthermore, there seems to be a significant increase of individuals holding seemingly untenable religious positions, e.g. individuals combining elements of Christianity with certain aspects of Buddhism and so forth. One of those positions that might be considered as untenable is that of so-called religious atheism. The point of this chapter will be to show that religious atheism is not a contradictio in terminis and to indicate that there is room for and proof of spirituality and religiosity for atheists.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In revisiting William James’ Varieties of Religious Experience, Charles Taylor points out that, in our post-Durkheimian world, individuals will make what they can of their religious experience. One of the consequences of these fractures, Taylor explains, is a rise in number of people calling themselves atheists, agnostics or non-religious. Furthermore, there seems to be a significant increase of individuals holding seemingly untenable religious positions, e.g. individuals combining elements of Christianity with certain aspects of Buddhism and so forth. One of those positions that might be considered as untenable is that of so-called religious atheism. The point of this chapter will be to show that religious atheism is not a contradictio in terminis and to indicate that there is room for and proof of spirituality and religiosity for atheists.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In revisiting William James’ Varieties of Religious Experience, Charles Taylor points out that, in our post-Durkheimian world, individuals will make what they can of their religious experience. One of the consequences of these fractures, Taylor explains, is a rise in number of people calling themselves atheists, agnostics or non-religious. Furthermore, there seems to be a significant increase of individuals holding seemingly untenable religious positions, e.g. individuals combining elements of Christianity with certain aspects of Buddhism and so forth. One of those positions that might be considered as untenable is that of so-called religious atheism. The point of this chapter will be to show that religious atheism is not a contradictio in terminis and to indicate that there is room for and proof of spirituality and religiosity for atheists.

Key concepts: Atheism, Religiosity, Buddhism, Religious studies, Spirituality, Christianity, Religious life, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Place for Religious Atheism in 21st Century Spirituality? — Research Paper | ScholarLens