2019Unpublished venueRequires access

Comparative Evaluation of Force Transmission and Wear Resistance between Titanium and Zirconia Abutment at Implant Abutment Interface after Cyclic Loading: An Invitro Study

Varanasi Vaishnavi

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Purpose of the study: The study examined the wear resistance of Titanium and Zirconia abutment at the implant – abutment interface after force transmission through cyclic loading simulating 4 months of intra oral function. Materials and methods: One implant with standard platform was connected to ten Titanium abutments (Group I) and one implant with standard platform was connected to ten Zirconia abutments Group II) which were positioned on the fibre reinforced epoxy resin block. The final torque of the implant was 45 N/cm. The abutments were connected and torqued to 25N/cm. The samples were cyclic loaded at 200 N at frequency of 2Hz for 1,80,000 cycles to simulate 4 months of intra oral function. The samples underwent SEM analysis before and after cyclic loading. The post cyclic loaded samples underwent EDAX to examine the suspended particles. The results were statistically analyzed using ‘t’ test and Levene’s test. Results: The wear resistance of the post cyclic loaded Group I (2.22%) were higher than the Group II (12.01%) at the implant- abutment interface and was statistically significant. The EDAX revealed the suspended particles at the implant-abutment interface was higher for Group II (62.42%) than Group I (8.36%) and was statistically significant. Conclusion: Wear at the implant abutment - interface was higher for Zirconia abutments compared to Titanium abutments. Dispersion of particles was higher in Zirconia abutments at the implant-abutment interface than Titanium abutments.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Purpose of the study: The study examined the wear resistance of Titanium and Zirconia abutment at the implant – abutment interface after force transmission through cyclic loading simulating 4 months of intra oral function. Materials and methods: One implant with standard platform was connected to ten Titanium abutments (Group I) and one implant with standard platform was connected to ten Zirconia abutments Group II) which were positioned on the fibre reinforced epoxy resin block. The final torque of the implant was 45 N/cm. The abutments were connected and torqued to 25N/cm. The samples were cyclic loaded at 200 N at frequency of 2Hz for 1,80,000 cycles to simulate 4 months of intra oral function. The samples underwent SEM analysis before and after cyclic loading. The post cyclic loaded samples underwent EDAX to examine the suspended particles. The results were statistically analyzed using ‘t’ test and Levene’s test. Results: The wear resistance of the post cyclic loaded Group I (2.22%) were higher than the Group II (12.01%) at the implant- abutment interface and was statistically significant. The EDAX revealed the suspended particles at the implant-abutment interface was higher for Group II (62.42%) than Group I (8.36%) and was statistically significant. Conclusion: Wear at the implant abutment - interface was higher for Zirconia abutments compared to Titanium abutments. Dispersion of particles was higher in Zirconia abutments at the implant-abutment interface than Titanium abutments.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Purpose of the study: The study examined the wear resistance of Titanium and Zirconia abutment at the implant – abutment interface after force transmission through cyclic loading simulating 4 months of intra oral function. Materials and methods: One implant with standard platform was connected to ten Titanium abutments (Group I) and one implant with standard platform was connected to ten Zirconia abutments Group II) which were positioned on the fibre reinforced epoxy resin block. The final torque of the implant was 45 N/cm. The abutments were connected and torqued to 25N/cm. The samples were cyclic loaded at 200 N at frequency of 2Hz for 1,80,000 cycles to simulate 4 months of intra oral function. The samples underwent SEM analysis before and after cyclic loading. The post cyclic loaded samples underwent EDAX to examine the suspended particles. The results were statistically analyzed using ‘t’ test and Levene’s test. Results: The wear resistance of the post cyclic loaded Group I (2.22%) were higher than the Group II (12.01%) at the implant- abutment interface and was statistically significant. The EDAX revealed the suspended particles at the implant-abutment interface was higher for Group II (62.42%) than Group I (8.36%) and was statistically significant. Conclusion: Wear at the implant abutment - interface was higher for Zirconia abutments compared to Titanium abutments. Dispersion of particles was higher in Zirconia abutments at the implant-abutment interface than Titanium abutments.

Key concepts: Abutment, Cubic zirconia, Materials science, Implant, Titanium, Dental Abutments, Dentistry, Cyclic stress

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative Evaluation of Force Transmission and Wear Resistance between Titanium and Zirconia Abutment at Implant Abutment Interface after Cyclic Loading: An Invitro Study — Research Paper | ScholarLens