2020Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

The Threshold of Cyber Warfare: from Use of Cyber Force to Cyber Armed Attack

François Delerue

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

This chapter analyses the application of jus contra bellum (the law against war) to cyber operations and demonstrates that the vast majority of cyber operations fall below the threshold required for the application of jus contra bellum . It analyses whether cyber operations may reach and cross the three thresholds of jus contra bellum – namely a use of force, a threat of force and an armed attack. It has been observed that no State or international organisation has ever publicly and unequivocally qualified a cyber operation as a use of force, and a fortiori an armed attack. This chapter, however, demonstrates that in some circumstances cyber operations may amount to a use of force, a threat of force or even an armed attack. The conclusion is that most state-sponsored cyber operations fall short of the required thresholds. Hence, they should be considered beyond the legal framework of jus contra bellum .

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter analyses the application of jus contra bellum (the law against war) to cyber operations and demonstrates that the vast majority of cyber operations fall below the threshold required for the application of jus contra bellum . It analyses whether cyber operations may reach and cross the three thresholds of jus contra bellum – namely a use of force, a threat of force and an armed attack. It has been observed that no State or international organisation has ever publicly and unequivocally qualified a cyber operation as a use of force, and a fortiori an armed attack. This chapter, however, demonstrates that in some circumstances cyber operations may amount to a use of force, a threat of force or even an armed attack. The conclusion is that most state-sponsored cyber operations fall short of the required thresholds. Hence, they should be considered beyond the legal framework of jus contra bellum .

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter analyses the application of jus contra bellum (the law against war) to cyber operations and demonstrates that the vast majority of cyber operations fall below the threshold required for the application of jus contra bellum . It analyses whether cyber operations may reach and cross the three thresholds of jus contra bellum – namely a use of force, a threat of force and an armed attack. It has been observed that no State or international organisation has ever publicly and unequivocally qualified a cyber operation as a use of force, and a fortiori an armed attack. This chapter, however, demonstrates that in some circumstances cyber operations may amount to a use of force, a threat of force or even an armed attack. The conclusion is that most state-sponsored cyber operations fall short of the required thresholds. Hence, they should be considered beyond the legal framework of jus contra bellum .

Key concepts: Jus ad bellum, Cyberwarfare, Cyber-attack, Use of force, Computer security, State (computer science), Law of war, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Threshold of Cyber Warfare: from Use of Cyber Force to Cyber Armed Attack — Research Paper | ScholarLens