2020•Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

Professional Responsibility and Conscientious Objection

Rosamond Rhodes

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Conscientious objection is a controversial topic in society and medical ethics. The central issue in medicine is whether claims of conscientious objection allow medical professionals to refuse to perform tasks that would otherwise be their duty. To inform the ongoing discussion, this chapter reviews the opposing views on conscience in the philosophic literature that describe conscience as either a moral sense or the dictate of reason. Both views hold that conscience should be obeyed, and that keeping promises is a conscience-given moral imperative. The chapter then considers exemplars of conscientious objection—Thoreau, Gandhi, and Martin Luther King Jr.—who were willing to bare the burdens of their convictions. It concludes by showing that doctors who put their own interests before their patients’ welfare violate their professional commitments and misappropriate the title “conscientious objector” because they are unwilling to bear the burdens of their choices while instead imposing burdens on patients and colleagues.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Conscientious objection is a controversial topic in society and medical ethics. The central issue in medicine is whether claims of conscientious objection allow medical professionals to refuse to perform tasks that would otherwise be their duty. To inform the ongoing discussion, this chapter reviews the opposing views on conscience in the philosophic literature that describe conscience as either a moral sense or the dictate of reason. Both views hold that conscience should be obeyed, and that keeping promises is a conscience-given moral imperative. The chapter then considers exemplars of conscientious objection—Thoreau, Gandhi, and Martin Luther King Jr.—who were willing to bare the burdens of their convictions. It concludes by showing that doctors who put their own interests before their patients’ welfare violate their professional commitments and misappropriate the title “conscientious objector” because they are unwilling to bear the burdens of their choices while instead imposing burdens on patients and colleagues.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Conscientious objection is a controversial topic in society and medical ethics. The central issue in medicine is whether claims of conscientious objection allow medical professionals to refuse to perform tasks that would otherwise be their duty. To inform the ongoing discussion, this chapter reviews the opposing views on conscience in the philosophic literature that describe conscience as either a moral sense or the dictate of reason. Both views hold that conscience should be obeyed, and that keeping promises is a conscience-given moral imperative. The chapter then considers exemplars of conscientious objection—Thoreau, Gandhi, and Martin Luther King Jr.—who were willing to bare the burdens of their convictions. It concludes by showing that doctors who put their own interests before their patients’ welfare violate their professional commitments and misappropriate the title “conscientious objector” because they are unwilling to bear the burdens of their choices while instead imposing burdens on patients and colleagues.

Key concepts: Conscientious objector, Conscience, Duty, Law, Medical ethics, Political science, Sociology, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Professional Responsibility and Conscientious Objection — Research Paper | ScholarLens