2020•Case Reports in Obstetrics Gynecology and ReproductiveOpen access

Prevention of Cervical Stenosis After Cervical Conization Using a Nelaton Catheter: A Retrospective Analysis of 556 Cases

Seiji Mabuchi, Hiroshi Kobayashi, Naoki Kawahara, Ryuji Kawaguchi, Seiji Mabuchi, Sho Matsubara, Yoshinori Takeda, Yuki Yamada

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate 1) the incidence of and risk factors for cervical stenosis, and 2) the ability of prophylactic catheter insertion to prevent the cervical stenosis after cervical conization. Methods: The clinical data of 556 females that were treated with cervical conization between August 2007 and December 2018 were collected. After excluding 65 postmenopausal women, the remaining 491 patients were included in this study, and their data were retrospectively reviewed. Cervical stenosis was defined as complete obstruction of the cervical canal or partial obstruction of the cervical canal accompanied by a menstrual disorder that developed after cervical conization. The patients were divided into two groups according to the catheter-indwelling period: the shorter group (catheter-indwelling period: <7 days) and longer group (catheter-indwelling period: ≥7 days). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of cervical stenosis. Results: After a median follow-up period of 37.3 months, 80 (16.3%) patients had developed cervical stenosis. Univariate and multivariate analyses confirmed that superficial conization (depth: <15mm) and a long catheter-indwelling period after cervical conization were significantly associated with a reduced risk of cervical stenosis. Conclusion: Cervical stenosis occurred in 16.3% of patients who underwent cervical conization. It was demonstrated that catheter insertion is safe and a longer catheter-indwelling period (≥7 days) and superficial conization (depth: <15mm) are associated with a reduced risk of cervical stenosis after cervical conization. Further prospective studies are needed to establish the optimal strategy for preventing cervical stenosis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: This study aimed to investigate 1) the incidence of and risk factors for cervical stenosis, and 2) the ability of prophylactic catheter insertion to prevent the cervical stenosis after cervical conization. Methods: The clinical data of 556 females that were treated with cervical conization between August 2007 and December 2018 were collected. After excluding 65 postmenopausal women, the remaining 491 patients were included in this study, and their data were retrospectively reviewed. Cervical stenosis was defined as complete obstruction of the cervical canal or partial obstruction of the cervical canal accompanied by a menstrual disorder that developed after cervical conization. The patients were divided into two groups according to the catheter-indwelling period: the shorter group (catheter-indwelling period: <7 days) and longer group (catheter-indwelling period: ≥7 days). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of cervical stenosis. Results: After a median follow-up period of 37.3 months, 80 (16.3%) patients had developed cervical stenosis. Univariate and multivariate analyses confirmed that superficial conization (depth: <15mm) and a long catheter-indwelling period after cervical conization were significantly associated with a reduced risk of cervical stenosis. Conclusion: Cervical stenosis occurred in 16.3% of patients who underwent cervical conization. It was demonstrated that catheter insertion is safe and a longer catheter-indwelling period (≥7 days) and superficial conization (depth: <15mm) are associated with a reduced risk of cervical stenosis after cervical conization. Further prospective studies are needed to establish the optimal strategy for preventing cervical stenosis.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate 1) the incidence of and risk factors for cervical stenosis, and 2) the ability of prophylactic catheter insertion to prevent the cervical stenosis after cervical conization. Methods: The clinical data of 556 females that were treated with cervical conization between August 2007 and December 2018 were collected. After excluding 65 postmenopausal women, the remaining 491 patients were included in this study, and their data were retrospectively reviewed. Cervical stenosis was defined as complete obstruction of the cervical canal or partial obstruction of the cervical canal accompanied by a menstrual disorder that developed after cervical conization. The patients were divided into two groups according to the catheter-indwelling period: the shorter group (catheter-indwelling period: <7 days) and longer group (catheter-indwelling period: ≥7 days). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of cervical stenosis. Results: After a median follow-up period of 37.3 months, 80 (16.3%) patients had developed cervical stenosis. Univariate and multivariate analyses confirmed that superficial conization (depth: <15mm) and a long catheter-indwelling period after cervical conization were significantly associated with a reduced risk of cervical stenosis. Conclusion: Cervical stenosis occurred in 16.3% of patients who underwent cervical conization. It was demonstrated that catheter insertion is safe and a longer catheter-indwelling period (≥7 days) and superficial conization (depth: <15mm) are associated with a reduced risk of cervical stenosis after cervical conization. Further prospective studies are needed to establish the optimal strategy for preventing cervical stenosis.

Key concepts: Medicine, Cervical conization, Cervical canal, Stenosis, Univariate analysis, Catheter, Surgery, Incidence (geometry)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Prevention of Cervical Stenosis After Cervical Conization Using a Nelaton Catheter: A Retrospective Analysis of 556 Cases — Research Paper | ScholarLens