1978•Unpublished venueRequires access

Primary, secondary and tertiary microcrater populations on lunar rocks: Effects of hypervelocity impact microejecta on primary populations.

R. P. Flavill, Robert J. Allison, J. A. M. McDonnell

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

Since return of the first Apollo lunar samples, the definition of the primary cosmic dust impact microcrater distribution on lunar regolith materials has been a prime research ob'ective. Well documented model crater populations have been measured on 60015 tl] and more recently on 12054 [2] representing an extensive and carefully executed observational achievement. We now ask how valid these models are; in particular how are such observed models related to the true primary crater distribution. A newly completed computer program presents calculations of secondary and tertiary microcrater numbers expected to be formed by each of these two model microcrater distributions. Basis for the work is experimentally measured secondary hyperveZocity impact craters formed from laboratory impacts on lunar rock. Previous laboratory measurements have been made of submicron impact spallation ejecta [31 and secondary hypervelocity microcraters 141 produced near impacts of 4-6 lans- iron microspheres on lunar crystalline rock (62235). It has been suggested that accreta and hypervelocity microdebris could be more significant in the development of lunar microfeatures

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Since return of the first Apollo lunar samples, the definition of the primary cosmic dust impact microcrater distribution on lunar regolith materials has been a prime research ob'ective. Well documented model crater populations have been measured on 60015 tl] and more recently on 12054 [2] representing an extensive and carefully executed observational achievement. We now ask how valid these models are; in particular how are such observed models related to the true primary crater distribution. A newly completed computer program presents calculations of secondary and tertiary microcrater numbers expected to be formed by each of these two model microcrater distributions. Basis for the work is experimentally measured secondary hyperveZocity impact craters formed from laboratory impacts on lunar rock. Previous laboratory measurements have been made of submicron impact spallation ejecta [31 and secondary hypervelocity microcraters 141 produced near impacts of 4-6 lans- iron microspheres on lunar crystalline rock (62235). It has been suggested that accreta and hypervelocity microdebris could be more significant in the development of lunar microfeatures

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Since return of the first Apollo lunar samples, the definition of the primary cosmic dust impact microcrater distribution on lunar regolith materials has been a prime research ob'ective. Well documented model crater populations have been measured on 60015 tl] and more recently on 12054 [2] representing an extensive and carefully executed observational achievement. We now ask how valid these models are; in particular how are such observed models related to the true primary crater distribution. A newly completed computer program presents calculations of secondary and tertiary microcrater numbers expected to be formed by each of these two model microcrater distributions. Basis for the work is experimentally measured secondary hyperveZocity impact craters formed from laboratory impacts on lunar rock. Previous laboratory measurements have been made of submicron impact spallation ejecta [31 and secondary hypervelocity microcraters 141 produced near impacts of 4-6 lans- iron microspheres on lunar crystalline rock (62235). It has been suggested that accreta and hypervelocity microdebris could be more significant in the development of lunar microfeatures

Key concepts: Hypervelocity, Primary (astronomy), Astrobiology, Geology, Earth science, Astronomy, Physics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Primary, secondary and tertiary microcrater populations on lunar rocks: Effects of hypervelocity impact microejecta on primary populations. — Research Paper | ScholarLens