2020Journal of Metamorphic GeologyRequires access

Eocene migmatite formation and diachronous burial revealed by petrochronology in NW Himalaya, Zanskar

Pavla Štípská, Prokop Závada, Stephen Collett, Andrew Kylander‐Clark, Bradley R. Hacker, Anne‐Sophie Tabaud, Martin Ráček

Open publisher page 20 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this contribution, we highlight the importance of in‐situ monazite geochronology linked to P−T modelling for identification of timescales of metamorphic processes. Barrovian‐type micaschists, migmatites and augengneiss from the Gumburanjun dome in the southeastern extremity of the Gianbul dome, NW Himalaya, have been studied in order to correlate the early stages of Himalayan metamorphism at different crustal levels and infer the timing of anatexis. P−T−t paths are constrained through combined pseudosection modelling and in‐situ and in‐mount monazite and xenotime laser ablation–split‐stream inductively coupled plasma‐mass spectrometry. Petrography and garnet zoning combined with pseudosection modelling show that garnet‐staurolite schists record burial from ~530 to 560°C and 5.5 kbar to ~630 to 660°C and 7 kbar; staurolite‐kyanite schists from ~530 to 560°C and 5 kbar to ~670 to 680°C and 7−9 kbar; and garnet‐kyanite migmatites from 540−570°C and 5 kbar to ~680 to 750°C and 7−10 kbar, probably also to >750°C and >9 kbar above the muscovite stability field. The decompression paths of garnet‐staurolite schists indicate cooling on decompression, while garnet rim chemistry and local sillimanite growth point to a stage of re‐equilibration at ~600 to 670°C and 4−6 kbar in some of the staurolite‐kyanite schists, and at ~670 to 700°C and 6 kbar in garnet‐kyanite migmatites. Some of the staurolite‐kyanite schists and garnet‐kyanite migmatites also contain andalusite or andalusite‐cordierite. Monazite and xenotime were analysed in thin sections in garnet, staurolite and kyanite, and in the matrix; and in mounts. BSE images and compositional maps of monazite (xenotime was too small) show variable internal structures from homogeneous through patchy zoning with embayed to sharp boundaries. Two groups of samples can be identified on the basis of the presence or absence of c. 44 − 37 Ma ages. The first group of samples—two garnet‐staurolite schists—recorded only c. 31 − 27 Ma ages in porphyroblasts and no c. 40 Ma ages. The second group (samples of staurolite‐kyanite schist, garnet‐kyanite migmatites, augengneiss) have both the older, c. 44 − 37 Ma monazite ages in porphyroblasts and younger ages down to c. 22 Ma. These significantly different ranges of ages from porphyroblasts of 44−37 Ma, and 31−27 Ma, are interpreted as the duration of prograde P−T paths in Eocene and Oligocene, and indicate diachronous two‐stage burial of rocks. Early migmatization occurred at 38 Ma. The c. 29 Ma is interpreted as the time when rocks from the lower and middle crustal levels were partially exhumed and came in to contact with rocks that were downgoing at this time. Localized monazite recrystallization is as young as 26−24 Ma. The youngest ages of 23−22 Ma are related to leucogranite emplacement.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract In this contribution, we highlight the importance of in‐situ monazite geochronology linked to P−T modelling for identification of timescales of metamorphic processes. Barrovian‐type micaschists, migmatites and augengneiss from the Gumburanjun dome in the southeastern extremity of the Gianbul dome, NW Himalaya, have been studied in order to correlate the early stages of Himalayan metamorphism at different crustal levels and infer the timing of anatexis. P−T−t paths are constrained through combined pseudosection modelling and in‐situ and in‐mount monazite and xenotime laser ablation–split‐stream inductively coupled plasma‐mass spectrometry. Petrography and garnet zoning combined with pseudosection modelling show that garnet‐staurolite schists record burial from ~530 to 560°C and 5.5 kbar to ~630 to 660°C and 7 kbar; staurolite‐kyanite schists from ~530 to 560°C and 5 kbar to ~670 to 680°C and 7−9 kbar; and garnet‐kyanite migmatites from 540−570°C and 5 kbar to ~680 to 750°C and 7−10 kbar, probably also to >750°C and >9 kbar above the muscovite stability field. The decompression paths of garnet‐staurolite schists indicate cooling on decompression, while garnet rim chemistry and local sillimanite growth point to a stage of re‐equilibration at ~600 to 670°C and 4−6 kbar in some of the staurolite‐kyanite schists, and at ~670 to 700°C and 6 kbar in garnet‐kyanite migmatites. Some of the staurolite‐kyanite schists and garnet‐kyanite migmatites also contain andalusite or andalusite‐cordierite. Monazite and xenotime were analysed in thin sections in garnet, staurolite and kyanite, and in the matrix; and in mounts. BSE images and compositional maps of monazite (xenotime was too small) show variable internal structures from homogeneous through patchy zoning with embayed to sharp boundaries. Two groups of samples can be identified on the basis of the presence or absence of c. 44 − 37 Ma ages. The first group of samples—two garnet‐staurolite schists—recorded only c. 31 − 27 Ma ages in porphyroblasts and no c. 40 Ma ages. The second group (samples of staurolite‐kyanite schist, garnet‐kyanite migmatites, augengneiss) have both the older, c. 44 − 37 Ma monazite ages in porphyroblasts and younger ages down to c. 22 Ma. These significantly different ranges of ages from porphyroblasts of 44−37 Ma, and 31−27 Ma, are interpreted as the duration of prograde P−T paths in Eocene and Oligocene, and indicate diachronous two‐stage burial of rocks. Early migmatization occurred at 38 Ma. The c. 29 Ma is interpreted as the time when rocks from the lower and middle crustal levels were partially exhumed and came in to contact with rocks that were downgoing at this time. Localized monazite recrystallization is as young as 26−24 Ma. The youngest ages of 23−22 Ma are related to leucogranite emplacement.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract In this contribution, we highlight the importance of in‐situ monazite geochronology linked to P−T modelling for identification of timescales of metamorphic processes. Barrovian‐type micaschists, migmatites and augengneiss from the Gumburanjun dome in the southeastern extremity of the Gianbul dome, NW Himalaya, have been studied in order to correlate the early stages of Himalayan metamorphism at different crustal levels and infer the timing of anatexis. P−T−t paths are constrained through combined pseudosection modelling and in‐situ and in‐mount monazite and xenotime laser ablation–split‐stream inductively coupled plasma‐mass spectrometry. Petrography and garnet zoning combined with pseudosection modelling show that garnet‐staurolite schists record burial from ~530 to 560°C and 5.5 kbar to ~630 to 660°C and 7 kbar; staurolite‐kyanite schists from ~530 to 560°C and 5 kbar to ~670 to 680°C and 7−9 kbar; and garnet‐kyanite migmatites from 540−570°C and 5 kbar to ~680 to 750°C and 7−10 kbar, probably also to >750°C and >9 kbar above the muscovite stability field. The decompression paths of garnet‐staurolite schists indicate cooling on decompression, while garnet rim chemistry and local sillimanite growth point to a stage of re‐equilibration at ~600 to 670°C and 4−6 kbar in some of the staurolite‐kyanite schists, and at ~670 to 700°C and 6 kbar in garnet‐kyanite migmatites. Some of the staurolite‐kyanite schists and garnet‐kyanite migmatites also contain andalusite or andalusite‐cordierite. Monazite and xenotime were analysed in thin sections in garnet, staurolite and kyanite, and in the matrix; and in mounts. BSE images and compositional maps of monazite (xenotime was too small) show variable internal structures from homogeneous through patchy zoning with embayed to sharp boundaries. Two groups of samples can be identified on the basis of the presence or absence of c. 44 − 37 Ma ages. The first group of samples—two garnet‐staurolite schists—recorded only c. 31 − 27 Ma ages in porphyroblasts and no c. 40 Ma ages. The second group (samples of staurolite‐kyanite schist, garnet‐kyanite migmatites, augengneiss) have both the older, c. 44 − 37 Ma monazite ages in porphyroblasts and younger ages down to c. 22 Ma. These significantly different ranges of ages from porphyroblasts of 44−37 Ma, and 31−27 Ma, are interpreted as the duration of prograde P−T paths in Eocene and Oligocene, and indicate diachronous two‐stage burial of rocks. Early migmatization occurred at 38 Ma. The c. 29 Ma is interpreted as the time when rocks from the lower and middle crustal levels were partially exhumed and came in to contact with rocks that were downgoing at this time. Localized monazite recrystallization is as young as 26−24 Ma. The youngest ages of 23−22 Ma are related to leucogranite emplacement.

Key concepts: Kyanite, Andalusite, Staurolite, Schist, Geology, Monazite, Migmatite, Metamorphic rock

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Eocene migmatite formation and diachronous burial revealed by petrochronology in NW Himalaya, Zanskar — Research Paper | ScholarLens