2020North American Journal of Fisheries ManagementRequires access

Effects of White Sucker Removal and Stocking on Growth of Fishes in Northern Lakes

Troy G. Zorn, Mark S. Mylchreest, Arnold W. Abrahamson

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Continued management interest in using White Sucker Catostomus commersonii population manipulations to improve the growth of Northern Pike Esox lucius and potentially competing panfish species provided an opportunity to evaluate White Sucker removal and supplementation in Michigan lakes. Overabundant White Suckers from one lake were transferred into two lakes where higher populations were desired, with fish growth responses being evaluated in each lake and in a control lake pretransfer and at 5 years posttransfer. Criteria for project success were (1) continued low abundance of White Suckers in the removal lake and increased abundance in the recipient lakes; (2) positive growth response of panfish species to White Sucker removals; and (3) positive growth response of Northern Pike to White Sucker additions. After 5 years, White Sucker population abundance and recruitment patterns showed continued survival of stocked adults but little recruitment in stocked lakes and the fish species examined showed no clear positive growth responses to White Sucker manipulations. Fishery managers should carefully consider the costs and benefits of using White Sucker manipulations as a management tool.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Continued management interest in using White Sucker Catostomus commersonii population manipulations to improve the growth of Northern Pike Esox lucius and potentially competing panfish species provided an opportunity to evaluate White Sucker removal and supplementation in Michigan lakes. Overabundant White Suckers from one lake were transferred into two lakes where higher populations were desired, with fish growth responses being evaluated in each lake and in a control lake pretransfer and at 5 years posttransfer. Criteria for project success were (1) continued low abundance of White Suckers in the removal lake and increased abundance in the recipient lakes; (2) positive growth response of panfish species to White Sucker removals; and (3) positive growth response of Northern Pike to White Sucker additions. After 5 years, White Sucker population abundance and recruitment patterns showed continued survival of stocked adults but little recruitment in stocked lakes and the fish species examined showed no clear positive growth responses to White Sucker manipulations. Fishery managers should carefully consider the costs and benefits of using White Sucker manipulations as a management tool.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Continued management interest in using White Sucker Catostomus commersonii population manipulations to improve the growth of Northern Pike Esox lucius and potentially competing panfish species provided an opportunity to evaluate White Sucker removal and supplementation in Michigan lakes. Overabundant White Suckers from one lake were transferred into two lakes where higher populations were desired, with fish growth responses being evaluated in each lake and in a control lake pretransfer and at 5 years posttransfer. Criteria for project success were (1) continued low abundance of White Suckers in the removal lake and increased abundance in the recipient lakes; (2) positive growth response of panfish species to White Sucker removals; and (3) positive growth response of Northern Pike to White Sucker additions. After 5 years, White Sucker population abundance and recruitment patterns showed continued survival of stocked adults but little recruitment in stocked lakes and the fish species examined showed no clear positive growth responses to White Sucker manipulations. Fishery managers should carefully consider the costs and benefits of using White Sucker manipulations as a management tool.

Key concepts: Catostomus, Sucker, Esox, Pike, Abundance (ecology), Fishery, Stocking, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effects of White Sucker Removal and Stocking on Growth of Fishes in Northern Lakes — Research Paper | ScholarLens