One-Leg Standing and Y-Balance Test Performance in Elderly Fallers and Nonfallers
Kyu-Nam Park, Yang Mi, Tae-gi Yoo, Si‐hyun Kim
Abstract
Kyu-Nam Park, Yang Mi, Tae-gi Yoo, Si‐hyun Kim
Abstract
Background: Falls are one of the severe causes of injury and death in older adults. Objectives: The aims of this study were to compare the 1-leg standing time and Y-balance test score between older adults with and without a history of falls, and to examine the association between 1-leg standing and Y-balance test performance in older adults. Design: A cross-sectional study. Methods: Twelve older adults who had fallen in the past year and 27 who had not experienced falls participated. One-leg standing and Y-balance tests were used to assess balance. Results: There were no significant differences in 1-leg standing time or Y-balance test distance and percentage scores between fallers and nonfallers. One-leg standing showed a fair correlation with Y-balance test in excursion distance of posterolateral reach and scores of the posteromedial and posterolateral reach. Conclusions: One-leg standing and Y-balance tests are useful and easy-to-apply tools for assessing balance, and a significant correlation between performance on the 2 tests was demonstrated in the older adults in this study. However, additional evaluation with 1-leg standing and Y-balance test may be needed to identify differences in balance and fall risk between older fallers and nonfallers.
OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Background: Falls are one of the severe causes of injury and death in older adults. Objectives: The aims of this study were to compare the 1-leg standing time and Y-balance test score between older adults with and without a history of falls, and to examine the association between 1-leg standing and Y-balance test performance in older adults. Design: A cross-sectional study. Methods: Twelve older adults who had fallen in the past year and 27 who had not experienced falls participated. One-leg standing and Y-balance tests were used to assess balance. Results: There were no significant differences in 1-leg standing time or Y-balance test distance and percentage scores between fallers and nonfallers. One-leg standing showed a fair correlation with Y-balance test in excursion distance of posterolateral reach and scores of the posteromedial and posterolateral reach. Conclusions: One-leg standing and Y-balance tests are useful and easy-to-apply tools for assessing balance, and a significant correlation between performance on the 2 tests was demonstrated in the older adults in this study. However, additional evaluation with 1-leg standing and Y-balance test may be needed to identify differences in balance and fall risk between older fallers and nonfallers.
Key concepts: Balance (ability), Balance test, Medicine, Dynamic balance, Timed Up and Go test, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Test (biology), Physical therapy