2020Edward Elgar Publishing eBooksRequires access

Competition law and economics: international cooperation and convergence in competition policy

Jay Pil Choi

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This chapter discusses issues that arise with “decentralized” enforcement of antitrust across jurisdictions due to the proliferation of independent antitrust authorities. The overview examines potential pitfalls of antitrust proliferation, particularly enforcement externalities. The chapter then focuses on specific enforcement areas such as mergers and acquisitions, single-firm conduct by dominant firms and international cartels. The author suggests potential pathways to achieve policy harmonization across jurisdictions. He proposes that the best way to achieve any commonality and harmonization is through movement toward effects-based antitrust enforcement guided by sophisticated economic reasoning rather than a formalistic approach. The effects-based approach enables antitrust agencies to find common ground and be insulated from political considerations and subjective beliefs, thereby promoting predictability and uniformity in antitrust enforcement.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter discusses issues that arise with “decentralized” enforcement of antitrust across jurisdictions due to the proliferation of independent antitrust authorities. The overview examines potential pitfalls of antitrust proliferation, particularly enforcement externalities. The chapter then focuses on specific enforcement areas such as mergers and acquisitions, single-firm conduct by dominant firms and international cartels. The author suggests potential pathways to achieve policy harmonization across jurisdictions. He proposes that the best way to achieve any commonality and harmonization is through movement toward effects-based antitrust enforcement guided by sophisticated economic reasoning rather than a formalistic approach. The effects-based approach enables antitrust agencies to find common ground and be insulated from political considerations and subjective beliefs, thereby promoting predictability and uniformity in antitrust enforcement.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter discusses issues that arise with “decentralized” enforcement of antitrust across jurisdictions due to the proliferation of independent antitrust authorities. The overview examines potential pitfalls of antitrust proliferation, particularly enforcement externalities. The chapter then focuses on specific enforcement areas such as mergers and acquisitions, single-firm conduct by dominant firms and international cartels. The author suggests potential pathways to achieve policy harmonization across jurisdictions. He proposes that the best way to achieve any commonality and harmonization is through movement toward effects-based antitrust enforcement guided by sophisticated economic reasoning rather than a formalistic approach. The effects-based approach enables antitrust agencies to find common ground and be insulated from political considerations and subjective beliefs, thereby promoting predictability and uniformity in antitrust enforcement.

Key concepts: Enforcement, Harmonization, Competition (biology), Externality, Law and economics, Convergence (economics), International trade, Competition law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Competition law and economics: international cooperation and convergence in competition policy — Research Paper | ScholarLens