2020Unpublished venueRequires access

The Politics of the Constitution

David Robertson

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

As a national crisis of governing deepened, delegates from a dozen states met in Philadelphia to propose improvements in the existing Congress under the Articles of Confederation. These delegates agreed on the necessity of a more stable republican government with additional powers. But political conflict dominated the Constitutional Convention because some delegates sought to add many broad powers to the national government while others sought to add a few limited national powers while protecting most of the states’ responsibilities. Southerners, determined to protect slavery, won provisions that ensured them additional House seats, maintenance of the slave trade, and the return of fugitive slaves. During the ratification process, opponents of the Constitution, termed “Anti-Federalists,” extensively criticized the document. Key states narrowly ratified the Constitution by mid-1788, and three years later, the states ratified the Bill of Rights, ten amendments that aimed to protect citizens from abuses by the federal government.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

As a national crisis of governing deepened, delegates from a dozen states met in Philadelphia to propose improvements in the existing Congress under the Articles of Confederation. These delegates agreed on the necessity of a more stable republican government with additional powers. But political conflict dominated the Constitutional Convention because some delegates sought to add many broad powers to the national government while others sought to add a few limited national powers while protecting most of the states’ responsibilities. Southerners, determined to protect slavery, won provisions that ensured them additional House seats, maintenance of the slave trade, and the return of fugitive slaves. During the ratification process, opponents of the Constitution, termed “Anti-Federalists,” extensively criticized the document. Key states narrowly ratified the Constitution by mid-1788, and three years later, the states ratified the Bill of Rights, ten amendments that aimed to protect citizens from abuses by the federal government.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

As a national crisis of governing deepened, delegates from a dozen states met in Philadelphia to propose improvements in the existing Congress under the Articles of Confederation. These delegates agreed on the necessity of a more stable republican government with additional powers. But political conflict dominated the Constitutional Convention because some delegates sought to add many broad powers to the national government while others sought to add a few limited national powers while protecting most of the states’ responsibilities. Southerners, determined to protect slavery, won provisions that ensured them additional House seats, maintenance of the slave trade, and the return of fugitive slaves. During the ratification process, opponents of the Constitution, termed “Anti-Federalists,” extensively criticized the document. Key states narrowly ratified the Constitution by mid-1788, and three years later, the states ratified the Bill of Rights, ten amendments that aimed to protect citizens from abuses by the federal government.

Key concepts: Ratification, Constitution, Political science, Law, Politics, Convention, Government (linguistics), Bill of rights

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Politics of the Constitution — Research Paper | ScholarLens