1977Unpublished venueRequires access

A Reasoned Approach to Officer Evaluation

Edward Dunne, Jr. .

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The general subject of personnel appraisal systems is reviewed as a basis for the development of the general form of an Officer Evaluation System. In this development, unique aspects of the military environment are identified, a clear statement of purpose is chosen, and the distinction between performance evaluation (assessment of past performance) and potential evaluation (assessment of future performance) is drawn. Six criteria for a military Officer Evaluation System are proposed: Clear purpose, valid rating factors, equally fair, simple, provisions for errors and inflation, and consistent with prevailing management philosophy. The proposed system collects three types of information--experience, performance evaluations, and potential evaluations--for input to two necessary organizational processes--personnel movements and superior-subordinate communication. Inflation control mechanisms are recommended only for evaluations of potential.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The general subject of personnel appraisal systems is reviewed as a basis for the development of the general form of an Officer Evaluation System. In this development, unique aspects of the military environment are identified, a clear statement of purpose is chosen, and the distinction between performance evaluation (assessment of past performance) and potential evaluation (assessment of future performance) is drawn. Six criteria for a military Officer Evaluation System are proposed: Clear purpose, valid rating factors, equally fair, simple, provisions for errors and inflation, and consistent with prevailing management philosophy. The proposed system collects three types of information--experience, performance evaluations, and potential evaluations--for input to two necessary organizational processes--personnel movements and superior-subordinate communication. Inflation control mechanisms are recommended only for evaluations of potential.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The general subject of personnel appraisal systems is reviewed as a basis for the development of the general form of an Officer Evaluation System. In this development, unique aspects of the military environment are identified, a clear statement of purpose is chosen, and the distinction between performance evaluation (assessment of past performance) and potential evaluation (assessment of future performance) is drawn. Six criteria for a military Officer Evaluation System are proposed: Clear purpose, valid rating factors, equally fair, simple, provisions for errors and inflation, and consistent with prevailing management philosophy. The proposed system collects three types of information--experience, performance evaluations, and potential evaluations--for input to two necessary organizational processes--personnel movements and superior-subordinate communication. Inflation control mechanisms are recommended only for evaluations of potential.

Key concepts: Officer, Business, Political science, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Reasoned Approach to Officer Evaluation — Research Paper | ScholarLens