2020Geosynthetics InternationalRequires access

Centrifuge study of reinforced soil walls with different backfill compaction densities

Peng Xu, Kianoosh Hatami, Guanlu Jiang

Open publisher page 19 citations

Abstract

Backfill relative density can have a significant influence on the performance and stability of reinforced soil retaining walls, as reflected in the form of minimum compaction requirements in current design guidelines. However, the quantitative influence of backfill relative density on the construction and serviceability performance of reinforced soil walls has not been examined adequately. In this study, centrifuge tests were carried out on two model walls with different backfill relative densities, and their measured performances were compared against those calculated using available empirical methods. Results of the study show that maximum displacement of the model with inadequate compaction (i.e. Dr = 65%) was 30% greater than that of the Dr = 95% model and exceeded the value predicted by one of the design methods examined. The foundation pressure underneath the wall showed increased magnitudes under the facing and a nonlinear decrease with distance from the facing along the backfill. Additionally, the model with Dr = 95% developed larger reinforcement loads and mobilized soil-reinforcement interface coefficient values relative to the model with Dr = 65%.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Backfill relative density can have a significant influence on the performance and stability of reinforced soil retaining walls, as reflected in the form of minimum compaction requirements in current design guidelines. However, the quantitative influence of backfill relative density on the construction and serviceability performance of reinforced soil walls has not been examined adequately. In this study, centrifuge tests were carried out on two model walls with different backfill relative densities, and their measured performances were compared against those calculated using available empirical methods. Results of the study show that maximum displacement of the model with inadequate compaction (i.e. Dr = 65%) was 30% greater than that of the Dr = 95% model and exceeded the value predicted by one of the design methods examined. The foundation pressure underneath the wall showed increased magnitudes under the facing and a nonlinear decrease with distance from the facing along the backfill. Additionally, the model with Dr = 95% developed larger reinforcement loads and mobilized soil-reinforcement interface coefficient values relative to the model with Dr = 65%.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Backfill relative density can have a significant influence on the performance and stability of reinforced soil retaining walls, as reflected in the form of minimum compaction requirements in current design guidelines. However, the quantitative influence of backfill relative density on the construction and serviceability performance of reinforced soil walls has not been examined adequately. In this study, centrifuge tests were carried out on two model walls with different backfill relative densities, and their measured performances were compared against those calculated using available empirical methods. Results of the study show that maximum displacement of the model with inadequate compaction (i.e. Dr = 65%) was 30% greater than that of the Dr = 95% model and exceeded the value predicted by one of the design methods examined. The foundation pressure underneath the wall showed increased magnitudes under the facing and a nonlinear decrease with distance from the facing along the backfill. Additionally, the model with Dr = 95% developed larger reinforcement loads and mobilized soil-reinforcement interface coefficient values relative to the model with Dr = 65%.

Key concepts: Serviceability (structure), Centrifuge, Geotechnical engineering, Relative density, Compaction, Geosynthetics, Foundation (evidence), Reinforcement

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Centrifuge study of reinforced soil walls with different backfill compaction densities — Research Paper | ScholarLens