2020•The FASEB JournalRequires access

The Shape Solidity of the Glenoid Fossa of the Scapula is Sexually Dimorphic: A New Approach to Understanding the Glenoid Fossa

Alexys M. Bolden, Jesse T. Burkett, J. Mason Shockley, Fatemah Alsharaf, Matthew J. Zdilla, H. Wayne Lambert

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Sexual dimorphism in the size of the glenoid fossa of the scapula is well‐established; however, there remains little information with regard to differences in glenoid shape between sexes. Therefore, this study assessed 71 glenoid fossae from dry scapula. Three differential equations were utilized to ensure that scapulae were appropriately sexed and, accordingly, included in the study. When all three equations were in agreement with regard to sex, the scapula was included for study. A total of 64 scapulae (45 females and 19 males) met inclusion criteria. Shape parameters that were assessed included circularity (4π*area/perimeter2), roundness (4*area/π*major axis2), aspect ratio of a bet‐fit ellipse (major axis/minor axis), and solidity (area/area of a convex hull). Shape parameters such as circularity, aspect ratio, and roundness were not significantly different between sexes; however, solidity was significantly different between females and males (p=0.0475). The results demonstrate a difference in the concavity of the boundary of the glenoid fossa between sexes. Further study should elucidate the functional differences in glenohumeral joint biomechanics with regard to the solidity of the glenoid fossa while taking sex into consideration. Support or Funding Information WV Research Challenge Fund [HEPC.dsr.17.06]

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Sexual dimorphism in the size of the glenoid fossa of the scapula is well‐established; however, there remains little information with regard to differences in glenoid shape between sexes. Therefore, this study assessed 71 glenoid fossae from dry scapula. Three differential equations were utilized to ensure that scapulae were appropriately sexed and, accordingly, included in the study. When all three equations were in agreement with regard to sex, the scapula was included for study. A total of 64 scapulae (45 females and 19 males) met inclusion criteria. Shape parameters that were assessed included circularity (4π*area/perimeter2), roundness (4*area/π*major axis2), aspect ratio of a bet‐fit ellipse (major axis/minor axis), and solidity (area/area of a convex hull). Shape parameters such as circularity, aspect ratio, and roundness were not significantly different between sexes; however, solidity was significantly different between females and males (p=0.0475). The results demonstrate a difference in the concavity of the boundary of the glenoid fossa between sexes. Further study should elucidate the functional differences in glenohumeral joint biomechanics with regard to the solidity of the glenoid fossa while taking sex into consideration. Support or Funding Information WV Research Challenge Fund [HEPC.dsr.17.06]

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Sexual dimorphism in the size of the glenoid fossa of the scapula is well‐established; however, there remains little information with regard to differences in glenoid shape between sexes. Therefore, this study assessed 71 glenoid fossae from dry scapula. Three differential equations were utilized to ensure that scapulae were appropriately sexed and, accordingly, included in the study. When all three equations were in agreement with regard to sex, the scapula was included for study. A total of 64 scapulae (45 females and 19 males) met inclusion criteria. Shape parameters that were assessed included circularity (4π*area/perimeter2), roundness (4*area/π*major axis2), aspect ratio of a bet‐fit ellipse (major axis/minor axis), and solidity (area/area of a convex hull). Shape parameters such as circularity, aspect ratio, and roundness were not significantly different between sexes; however, solidity was significantly different between females and males (p=0.0475). The results demonstrate a difference in the concavity of the boundary of the glenoid fossa between sexes. Further study should elucidate the functional differences in glenohumeral joint biomechanics with regard to the solidity of the glenoid fossa while taking sex into consideration. Support or Funding Information WV Research Challenge Fund [HEPC.dsr.17.06]

Key concepts: Fossa, Solidity, Scapula, Glenoid cavity, Roundness (object), Anatomy, Medicine, Orthodontics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Shape Solidity of the Glenoid Fossa of the Scapula is Sexually Dimorphic: A New Approach to Understanding the Glenoid Fossa — Research Paper | ScholarLens