2020The FASEB JournalRequires access

Case Report: A Unique Unilateral Variation of a Divided Extensor Digitorum Muscle in a Subject with Bilateral Absence of Extensor Indicis

Stephen P. Schettler, James P. Lister, Joseph Miller

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Reports of variations in the extensor digitorum muscle have been documented since at least 1813. These variations have fallen into 6 groups: (1) deficiencies in tendon number – usually the tendon to the 5thdigit being absent, (2) doubling of tendons to digits, (3) difference in number of muscle bellies, (4) presence of tendinous slips that join other muscles, (5) presence and arrangement of intertendinous connections, (6) presence of separate muscle bellies for each tendon, and (7) accessory muscle bellies. The present case report describes a unilateral variation of the extensor digitorum muscle, observed in a 73 year‐old Caucasian male with bilateral absence of the extensor indicis muscles. During anatomical dissection of this individual, we observed that the extensor digitorum muscle on the subject’s right side appeared to be divided into two distinct muscle masses. The lateral muscle mass (1 cm wide at its thickest point and 11 cm in length) originated from the medial aspect of the extensor carpi radialis brevis and provided a tendon (20 cm in length) to the index finger. The medial muscle mass had the usual origin to the lateral epicondyle via the common extensor tendon and provided tendons to the third and fourth digits. Interestingly, the extensor indicis muscles were also absent bilaterally. While cases of absent extensor indicis muscles have been reported previously, we are not aware of any report in the literature that describes a divided extensor digitorum muscle or such a divided extensor digitorum muscle occurring in the presence of bilaterally missing extensor indicis muscles. Indeed, to our knowledge, this is the first such report of this occurrence. Thus, to the 6 groups of variant types commonly recognized for extensor digitorum as listed above, we now add a 7th new category of “divided muscle mass” (which in our case is “bipartite”, but future studies may discover other arrangements). Developmental and functional considerations of this variation will be further discussed. Support or Funding Information Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Reports of variations in the extensor digitorum muscle have been documented since at least 1813. These variations have fallen into 6 groups: (1) deficiencies in tendon number – usually the tendon to the 5thdigit being absent, (2) doubling of tendons to digits, (3) difference in number of muscle bellies, (4) presence of tendinous slips that join other muscles, (5) presence and arrangement of intertendinous connections, (6) presence of separate muscle bellies for each tendon, and (7) accessory muscle bellies. The present case report describes a unilateral variation of the extensor digitorum muscle, observed in a 73 year‐old Caucasian male with bilateral absence of the extensor indicis muscles. During anatomical dissection of this individual, we observed that the extensor digitorum muscle on the subject’s right side appeared to be divided into two distinct muscle masses. The lateral muscle mass (1 cm wide at its thickest point and 11 cm in length) originated from the medial aspect of the extensor carpi radialis brevis and provided a tendon (20 cm in length) to the index finger. The medial muscle mass had the usual origin to the lateral epicondyle via the common extensor tendon and provided tendons to the third and fourth digits. Interestingly, the extensor indicis muscles were also absent bilaterally. While cases of absent extensor indicis muscles have been reported previously, we are not aware of any report in the literature that describes a divided extensor digitorum muscle or such a divided extensor digitorum muscle occurring in the presence of bilaterally missing extensor indicis muscles. Indeed, to our knowledge, this is the first such report of this occurrence. Thus, to the 6 groups of variant types commonly recognized for extensor digitorum as listed above, we now add a 7th new category of “divided muscle mass” (which in our case is “bipartite”, but future studies may discover other arrangements). Developmental and functional considerations of this variation will be further discussed. Support or Funding Information Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Reports of variations in the extensor digitorum muscle have been documented since at least 1813. These variations have fallen into 6 groups: (1) deficiencies in tendon number – usually the tendon to the 5thdigit being absent, (2) doubling of tendons to digits, (3) difference in number of muscle bellies, (4) presence of tendinous slips that join other muscles, (5) presence and arrangement of intertendinous connections, (6) presence of separate muscle bellies for each tendon, and (7) accessory muscle bellies. The present case report describes a unilateral variation of the extensor digitorum muscle, observed in a 73 year‐old Caucasian male with bilateral absence of the extensor indicis muscles. During anatomical dissection of this individual, we observed that the extensor digitorum muscle on the subject’s right side appeared to be divided into two distinct muscle masses. The lateral muscle mass (1 cm wide at its thickest point and 11 cm in length) originated from the medial aspect of the extensor carpi radialis brevis and provided a tendon (20 cm in length) to the index finger. The medial muscle mass had the usual origin to the lateral epicondyle via the common extensor tendon and provided tendons to the third and fourth digits. Interestingly, the extensor indicis muscles were also absent bilaterally. While cases of absent extensor indicis muscles have been reported previously, we are not aware of any report in the literature that describes a divided extensor digitorum muscle or such a divided extensor digitorum muscle occurring in the presence of bilaterally missing extensor indicis muscles. Indeed, to our knowledge, this is the first such report of this occurrence. Thus, to the 6 groups of variant types commonly recognized for extensor digitorum as listed above, we now add a 7th new category of “divided muscle mass” (which in our case is “bipartite”, but future studies may discover other arrangements). Developmental and functional considerations of this variation will be further discussed. Support or Funding Information Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA

Key concepts: Anatomy, Extensor Digitorum Communis, Tendon, Extensor digitorum muscle, Medicine, Extensor digitorum longus muscle, Extensor muscle, Muscle belly

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Case Report: A Unique Unilateral Variation of a Divided Extensor Digitorum Muscle in a Subject with Bilateral Absence of Extensor Indicis — Research Paper | ScholarLens